ArticlePostepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology2018
CHA
Article in Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thromboembolic Episodes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Without Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter Are Related to the Presence of at Least 3 Points in the CHAJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- RCirculation reports · 2024Article
- CHAJournal of nephrology · 2024Article
- Atrial high-rate episodes intensify RScientific reports · 2023Article
- New RFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Does CHA2DS2-VASc score predict mortality in chronic kidney disease?Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Article
- New CHABMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020Observational
- Predictive role of CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in acute coronary syndrome patients and value of adding global longitudinal strain to CHA₂DS₂-VASc score.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe CHA
aimTo assess the role of the CHA MATERIAL AND
methodsWe enrolled 212 consecutive patients with both ST-elevation and non-ST-elevation MI referred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients were divided into two groups depending on the CHA
resultsThe group with a CHA
conclusionsThe CHA
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.