Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30603016›Full record

ArticleAfrican health sciences2018

Family physicians' utility of social media: a survey comparison among family medicine residents and physicians.

Karim Syed Irfan, Irfan Farhana, Al Faris Eiad, Al Maflehi Nassr, Al Qahtani Al Mohammed, Nadeem Maya, Al Hazmi Ali, M A Ahmed Abdullah, Ponnamperuma Gominda, Vleuten Cees van der

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in African health sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Karim Syed IrfanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Irfan FarhanaKing Saud University Chair of Medical Education Research and Development, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Al Faris EiadKing Saud University Chair of Medical Education Research and Development, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Al Maflehi NassrCollege of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Al Qahtani Al MohammedDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Nadeem MayaUniversity College, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Al Hazmi AliDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
M A Ahmed AbdullahKing Saud University Chair of Medical Education Research and Development, Department of Family and Community Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ponnamperuma GomindaCentre for Medical Education, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Vleuten Cees van derDeparmtent of Educational Development & Research Maastricht University, Netherland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocial media has become ubiquitous and has brought a dramatic change in health services. Little is known about its use by family physicians and residents for personal or professional purpose. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the utility of social media among family medicine residents and consultants.

methodsThe collection of data was through the use of a five part questionnaire developed by researchers. The questionnaire was delivered to 70 physicians and 100 residents, out of which 132questionnaires were completed, representing a 78 percent response rate.

resultsOur findings demonstrate that there was an overall high use of social media. Females used social media more for general education and professional purposes. Men, by contrast, used it more frequently for personal purposes. The participants in this study appeared to consider social media as having several useful dimensions, such as: enabling them to accomplish job tasks, improve job performance, productivity and more effective patient care when using social media.

conclusionsTo date, limited studies have compared social media use among family physicians and residents. This study may serve as an initial step for future studies explaining the pattern of use among physicians.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleMiddle AgedPhysicians, FamilySocial MediaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultattitudes and gender differencesfamily physicianslearningpattern of usesocial media

Identifiers

PMID30603016
PMCPMC6307000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.