Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30602584›Full record

ArticlemBio2019

Nelly Dubarry, Clare R Willis, Graeme Ball, Christian Lesterlin, Judith P Armitage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. SMC protein RecN drives RecA filament translocation for in vivo homology search.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Conformation and dynamic interactions of the multipartite genome inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nelly DubarryDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Clare R WillisDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Graeme BallDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christian LesterlinDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Judith P ArmitageDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom judith.armitage@bioch.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4983-9731

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT083469MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coordinating chromosome duplication and segregation with cell division is clearly critical for bacterial species with one chromosome. The precise choreography required is even more complex in species with more than one chromosome. The alpha subgroup of bacteria contains not only one of the best-studied bacterial species,

Indexed as

Cell DivisionChromosomes, BacterialChromosome SegregationBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsIntravital MicroscopyProtein TransportRhodobacter sphaeroidesBacterial ProteinsCell Cycle Proteinscell divisionchromosome organizationchromosome segregationFtsZMipZRhodobacter

Identifiers

PMID30602584
PMCPMC6315104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.