ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance2019
Pelvic cardiovascular magnetic resonance venography: venous changes with patient position and hydration status.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pelvic pain of venous origin: diagnostic insights from transvaginal ultrasonography.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Complications of Deep Venous Stenting and Their Management.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Review
- Diagnosis and Management of Pelvic Venous Disorders in Women.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Review
- Cognitive Function among Young Women's Football Players in the Summer Heat.Translational sports medicine · 2023Article
- End Stage Hip Osteoarthritis in Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome - A Case Report.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2022Article
- May-Thurner syndrome.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Review
- Review of imaging and endovascular intervention of iliocaval venous compression syndrome.World journal of radiology · 2020Review
- Usefulness of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging prior to venous interventions.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2019Article
- Black-blood Venous Imaging (BBVI): A Contrast-Free and High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Approach for Diagnosing IVCS - a Proof of Concept Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo determine the effect of hydration as well as prone versus supine positioning on the pelvic veins during cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) venography.
methodsUnder institutional review board approval, 8 healthy subjects were imaged with balanced steady state free precession, non-contrast CMR venography to measure common and external iliac vein volumes and common femoral vein cross-sectional area in the supine, prone and decubitus positions after dehydration and again following re-hydration. CMR venography from 23 patients imaged both supine and prone were retrospectively reviewed and measurements of common femoral and iliac veins areas were compared using Wilcoxon test.
resultsCommon femoral vein area on CMR venography increased with prone positioning (83 ± 35 mm
conclusionsCommon femoral and common/external iliac vein size on CMR venography may be affected by position and hydration status. Routine clinical CMR venography of the pelvis could include prone positioning and avoiding dehydration to maximize pelvic vein distension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.