ArticleJAMA surgery2019
Reoperations After Bariatric Surgery in 26 Years of Follow-up of the Swedish Obese Subjects Study.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisional bariatric surgery following sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis comparing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one anastomosis gastric bypass.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical Outcomes, Risks, and Individualized Treatment Selection in Revisional Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Machine and Deep Learning Models for Preoperative Prediction of Suboptimal Clinical Response One Year after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery: Findings from the Tehran Obesity Treatment Study.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Is semaglutide a better weight-management option than bariatric surgery for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Article
- What Really Matters in Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery - 10 Years Follow-Up (BARI-10 -POL Study).Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- [Metabolic/bariatric surgery is effective : What is the evidence regarding hard endpoints and long-term outcomes?]Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Trends in bariatric surgery revisions: a 25-year single-institution experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Obesity and Its Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Letter to the Editor: Weight Maintenance as an Indication for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Introduction Long-Term Effects of Professional and Non-professional Support on a Healthy Lifestyle Following Bariatric Surgeries.Obesity surgery · 2025Article
- Long-term incidence of bariatric related procedures following laparoscopic gastric bypass: 15 to 20 years single institution experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as a Revisional Procedure After Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: Our Center Experience.Journal of obesity · 2025Article
- Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Nissen Sleeve as a Redo Surgery Post Gastric Banding for Non-responders to Weight Loss and Therapy-Resistant Reflux.Obesity surgery · 2024Article
- Obesity: a gender-view.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Review
- Revisional bariatric surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: characterizing patient and procedural factors and 30-day outcomes for a retrospective cohort of 4412 patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Experience of Robotic Complex Revisional Bariatric Surgery in a High-Volume Center.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Bariatric surgery: time to study sex.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2023Article
- Classification of Slippage Following Laparoscopic BariClip Gastroplasty.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
- Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass as Conversion Procedure of Failed Gastric Banding: Short-Term Outcomes of 1295 Patients in One Single Center.Obesity surgery · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedError in Figure.2019
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Bariatric surgery is an established treatment for obesity, but knowledge on the long-term incidence of revisional surgery is scarce. Objective: To determine the incidence and type of revisional surgery after bariatric surgery in 26 years of follow-up of participants in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SOS study is a prospective nonrandomized controlled study comparing bariatric surgery (banding, vertical banded gastroplasty [VBG], and gastric bypass [GBP]) with usual care. The bariatric surgeries in the SOS study were conducted at 25 public surgical departments in Sweden. Men with body mass index values of 34 or higher and women with body mass indexes of 38 or higher were recruited to the surgery group of the SOS study between September 1, 1987, and January 31, 2001, and follow-up continued until December 31, 2014. Data analysis occurred from November 2016 to April 2018. Interventions: Banding, VBG, or GBP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Revisional surgeries, analyzed using data from questionnaires, hospital records, and the Swedish National Patient register through December 31, 2014. Results: A total of 2010 participants underwent surgery. The age range was 37 to 60 years. A total of 376 participants underwent banding (18.7%), while 1365 had VBG (67.9%) and 266 had GBP (13.2%). During a median follow-up of 19 years, 559 participants (27.8%) underwent first-time revisional surgery, including 354 conversions to other bariatric procedures (17.6%), 114 corrective surgeries (5.6%), and 91 reversals to normal anatomy (4.5%). Revisional surgeries (conversions, corrective surgery, and reversals) were common after banding (153 of 376 [40.7%]) and VBG (386 of 1365 [28.3%]) but relatively rare after GBP (20 of 266 [7.5%]). Patients who had banding and VBG primarily underwent conversions to GBP or reversals. Incidence of reversals was 5 times higher after banding than after VBG (40.7% vs 7.5%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 5.19 [95% CI, 3.43-7.87]; P < .001). Corrective surgeries were equally common irrespective of the index surgery (72 of 1365 patients who had VBG [5.3%]; 23 of 376 patients who had banding [6.1%]; 19 of 266 patients who had GBP [7.1%]). Revisional surgery indications, including inadequate weight loss, band-associated complications (migration, stenosis, and slippage), staple-line disruptions, and postsurgical morbidity, varied depending on index surgery subgroup. Most corrections occurred within the first 10 years, whereas conversions and reversals occurred over the entire follow-up period. Conclusions and Relevance: Corrective surgeries occur mainly within the first 10 years and with similar incidences across all 3 surgical subgroups, but indications varied. Conversions (mainly to GBP) and reversals occurred after many years and were most frequent after banding and VBG, reflecting a higher overall revisional surgery demand after these operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.