Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30601881›Full record

ArticleJAMA surgery2019

Reoperations After Bariatric Surgery in 26 Years of Follow-up of the Swedish Obese Subjects Study.

Stephan Hjorth, Ingmar Näslund, Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson, Per-Arne Svensson, Peter Jacobson, Markku Peltonen, Lena M S Carlsson

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Sex Differences in Obesity and Its Treatment.Current psychiatry reports · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Obesity: a gender-view.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Bariatric surgery: time to study sex.Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephan HjorthInstitute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Ingmar NäslundDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Johanna C Andersson-AssarssonInstitute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Per-Arne SvenssonInstitute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Peter JacobsonInstitute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Markku PeltonenChronic Disease Prevention Unit, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Lena M S CarlssonInstitute of Medicine, the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg · SEFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIÖrebro University · SE

Funding

Benefits, Risks & Costs of Bariatric Surgery: Register-Enriched Cohort Studies.R01DK105948 · NIDDK · GOTEBORG UNIVERSITY · PI CARLSSON EKANDER, LENA, NEOVIUS, MARTIN · 2015 to 2018
$1.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK105948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Bariatric surgery is an established treatment for obesity, but knowledge on the long-term incidence of revisional surgery is scarce. Objective: To determine the incidence and type of revisional surgery after bariatric surgery in 26 years of follow-up of participants in the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study. Design, Setting, and Participants: The SOS study is a prospective nonrandomized controlled study comparing bariatric surgery (banding, vertical banded gastroplasty [VBG], and gastric bypass [GBP]) with usual care. The bariatric surgeries in the SOS study were conducted at 25 public surgical departments in Sweden. Men with body mass index values of 34 or higher and women with body mass indexes of 38 or higher were recruited to the surgery group of the SOS study between September 1, 1987, and January 31, 2001, and follow-up continued until December 31, 2014. Data analysis occurred from November 2016 to April 2018. Interventions: Banding, VBG, or GBP. Main Outcomes and Measures: Revisional surgeries, analyzed using data from questionnaires, hospital records, and the Swedish National Patient register through December 31, 2014. Results: A total of 2010 participants underwent surgery. The age range was 37 to 60 years. A total of 376 participants underwent banding (18.7%), while 1365 had VBG (67.9%) and 266 had GBP (13.2%). During a median follow-up of 19 years, 559 participants (27.8%) underwent first-time revisional surgery, including 354 conversions to other bariatric procedures (17.6%), 114 corrective surgeries (5.6%), and 91 reversals to normal anatomy (4.5%). Revisional surgeries (conversions, corrective surgery, and reversals) were common after banding (153 of 376 [40.7%]) and VBG (386 of 1365 [28.3%]) but relatively rare after GBP (20 of 266 [7.5%]). Patients who had banding and VBG primarily underwent conversions to GBP or reversals. Incidence of reversals was 5 times higher after banding than after VBG (40.7% vs 7.5%; unadjusted hazard ratio, 5.19 [95% CI, 3.43-7.87]; P < .001). Corrective surgeries were equally common irrespective of the index surgery (72 of 1365 patients who had VBG [5.3%]; 23 of 376 patients who had banding [6.1%]; 19 of 266 patients who had GBP [7.1%]). Revisional surgery indications, including inadequate weight loss, band-associated complications (migration, stenosis, and slippage), staple-line disruptions, and postsurgical morbidity, varied depending on index surgery subgroup. Most corrections occurred within the first 10 years, whereas conversions and reversals occurred over the entire follow-up period. Conclusions and Relevance: Corrective surgeries occur mainly within the first 10 years and with similar incidences across all 3 surgical subgroups, but indications varied. Conversions (mainly to GBP) and reversals occurred after many years and were most frequent after banding and VBG, reflecting a higher overall revisional surgery demand after these operations.

Indexed as

AdultEsophagitis, PepticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGastric BypassGastritisGastroesophageal RefluxGastroplastyHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityProspective StudiesReoperationSwedenTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID30601881
PMCPMC6484798
OpenAlexW2907794393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.