Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30601835›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

A multifaceted primary care practice-based intervention to reduce ED visits and hospitalization for complex medical patients: A mixed methods study.

Tara O'Brien, Noah Ivers, Onil Bhattacharyya, Andrew Calzavara, Laura Pus, Geetha Mukerji, Steven M Friedman, Howard Abrams, Ian Stanaitis, Gillian A Hawker and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tara O'BrienDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Noah IversWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Onil BhattacharyyaWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Andrew CalzavaraInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura PusWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Geetha MukerjiDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Steven M FriedmanDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Howard AbramsDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ian StanaitisWomen's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gillian A HawkerDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pauline PariserDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAUniversity Health Network · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of complex, multi-morbid patients is challenging for solo primary care providers (PCPs) with limited access to resources. The primary objective of the intervention was to reduce the overall rate of Emergency Department (ED) visits among patients in participating practices. METHODS AND

findingsAn interrupted time series design and qualitative interviews were used to evaluate a multifaceted intervention, SCOPE (Seamless Care Optimizing the Patient Experience), offered to solo PCPs whose patients were frequent users of the ED. The intervention featured a navigation hub (nurse, homecare coordinator) to link PCPs with hospital and community resources, a general internist on-call to provide phone advice or urgent assessments, and access to patient results on-line. Continuous quality improvement (QI) strategies were employed to optimize each component of the intervention. The primary outcome was the relative pre-post intervention change in ED visit rate for patients of participating practices compared with that for a propensity-matched control group of physicians over the contemporaneous period. Themes were identified from semi-structured interviews on PCP's experiences and influential factors in their engagement. Twenty-nine physicians agreed to participate and were provided access to the intervention over an 18-month time period. There were a total of 1,525 intervention contacts over the 18-months (average: 50.6±60.8 per PCP). Both intervention and control groups experienced a trend towards lower rates of ED use by their patients over the study time period. The pre-post difference in trend for the intervention group compared to the controls was not significant at 1.4% per year (RR = 1.014; p = 0.59). Several themes were identified from qualitative interviews including: PCPs felt better supported in the care of their patients; they experienced a greater sense of community, and; they were better able to provide shared primary-specialty care.

conclusionsThis multifaceted intervention to support solo PCPs in the management of their complex patients did not result in a reduced rate of ED visits compared to controls, likely related to variable uptake among PCPs. It did however result in more comprehensive and coordinated care for their patients. Future directions will focus on increasing uptake by improving ease of use, increasing the range of services offered and expanding to a larger number of PCPs.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPrivate PracticeAdultAgedComorbidityEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleHospitalizationHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleMiddle AgedOntarioOutcome Assessment, Health CarePhysicians, Primary CarePreventive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID30601835
PMCPMC6314574
OpenAlexW2907754311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.