Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30601581›Full record

Trial reportJournal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research2019

Reduction of Cortical Bone Turnover and Erosion Depth After 2 and 3 Years of Denosumab: Iliac Bone Histomorphometry in the FREEDOM Trial.

Pascale Chavassieux, Nathalie Portero-Muzy, Jean Paul Roux, Stéphane Horlait, David W Dempster, Andrea Wang, Rachel B Wagman, Roland Chapurlat

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A single dose of zoledronate preserves bone mineral density for up to 2 years after a second course of romosozumab.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Pascale ChavassieuxINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Nathalie Portero-MuzyINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Jean Paul RouxINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Stéphane HorlaitAmgen, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
David W DempsterDepartment of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Andrea WangAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Rachel B WagmanAmgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Roland ChapurlatINSERM UMR 1033, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Amgen (United States) · USInserm · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRColumbia University · USLaboratoire Vision Action Cognition · FR

Funding

Amgen, Inc.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, reduced the risk of vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures in the Fracture REduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis every 6 Months (FREEDOM) trial of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis compared with placebo. Previous bone histomorphometric analysis in FREEDOM showed decreased bone resorption and turnover in cancellous bone after 2 and 3 years. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of denosumab compared with placebo in the cortical compartment from transiliac bone biopsies obtained during FREEDOM. A total of 112 specimens were evaluable for cortical histomorphometry, including 67 obtained at month 24 (37 placebo, 30 denosumab) and 45 at month 36 (25 placebo, 20 denosumab). Eroded surface, osteoclast surface, erosion depth, and wall thickness were measured on the endocortical surface. Cortical thickness and cortical porosity were also measured. Dynamic parameters of bone formation were assessed for endocortical, periosteal, and intracortical envelopes. Endocortical osteoclast surface, eroded surface, and mean and maximum erosion depth were significantly lower in the denosumab group versus placebo at months 24 and 36 (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.04). Endocortical wall thickness and intracortical measures (cortical porosity and cortical thickness) were not different between the two groups. Dynamic parameters were low with tetracycline labels in cortical bone observed in 13 (43%) and 10 (50%) of denosumab biopsies at months 24 and 36, respectively, reflecting a marked decrease in bone turnover. In conclusion, our data reveal the mechanism of action of denosumab on cortical bone: inhibition of osteoclastic resorption and reduced activation of new remodeling sites. In addition, reduced endocortical erosion depth with no change of wall thickness may contribute to increased bone strength by reducing the bone loss and fragility associated with deep resorption cavities and may likely contribute to the greater BMD gain with denosumab than with other antiresorptive agents. © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research Published by Wiley Periodicals Inc.

Indexed as

Cortical BoneIliumOsteoclastsOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesAgedAged, 80 and overBone RemodelingDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedDenosumabCORTICAL BONEDENOSUMABEROSION DEPTHHISTOMORPHOMETRYOSTEOPOROSIS

Identifiers

PMID30601581
PMCPMC6850394
OpenAlexW2908475062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.