Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30601138›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2019

Mixing old and young: enhancing rejuvenation and accelerating aging.

Ashley Lau, Brian K Kennedy, James L Kirkland, Stefan G Tullius

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Stem Cell Aging and Regenerative Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  14. Senolytic drugs: from discovery to translation.Journal of internal medicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Scientific Papers and Patents on Substances with Unproven Effects. Part 2.Recent patents on drug delivery & formulation · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ashley LauDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brian K KennedyDepartments of Biochemistry and Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
James L KirklandRobert and Arlene Kogod Center on Aging, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Stefan G TulliusDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBuck Institute for Research on Aging · USHarvard University · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Effect of Aging on Preadipocyte DifferentiationR37AG013925 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KIRKLAND, JAMES L. · 2016 to 2025
$6.6M
Effect of Aging on Preadipocyte DifferentiationR01AG013925 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KIRKLAND, JAMES L. · 1997 to 2012
$3.7M
mTORC1 signaling in aging and metabolismR01AG050441 · NIA · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI KENNEDY, BRIAN K · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
Consequences of Aging on Immune Response and Transplant OutcomeR01AG039449 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TULLIUS, STEFAN GUNTHER · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
Consequences of Aging on Immune Response and Transplant OutcomeR56AG039449 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI TULLIUS, STEFAN GUNTHER · 2018 to 2018
$643k
mTORC1 signaling in aging and metabolismR56AG050441 · NIA · BUCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON AGING · PI KENNEDY, BRIAN K · 2015 to 2015
$587k
Senescent Cell Transplantation ModelR21AG049182 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KIRKLAND, JAMES L. · 2015 to 2016
$437k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013925NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039449NIA NIH HHS R01 AG050441NIA NIH HHS R21 AG049182NIA NIH HHS R37 AG013925NIA NIH HHS R56 AG039449NIA NIH HHS R56 AG050441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Donor age and recipient age are factors that influence transplantation outcomes. Aside from age-associated differences in intrinsic graft function and alloimmune responses, the ability of young and old cells to exert either rejuvenating or aging effects extrinsically may also apply to the transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells or solid organ transplants. While the potential for rejuvenation mediated by the transfer of youthful cells is currently being explored for therapeutic applications, aspects that relate to accelerating aging are no less clinically significant. Those effects may be particularly relevant in transplantation with an age discrepancy between donor and recipient. Here, we review recent advances in understanding the mechanisms by which young and old cells modify their environments to promote rejuvenation- or aging-associated phenotypes. We discuss their relevance to clinical transplantation and highlight potential opportunities for therapeutic intervention.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationOrgan TransplantationTissue DonorsAgingAllograftsAnimalsCellular MicroenvironmentCellular SenescenceHumans

Identifiers

PMID30601138
PMCPMC6307961
OpenAlexW2907257223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.