Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600647›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental neurobiology2019

A Comparative Perspective on Brain Regeneration in Amphibians and Teleost Fish.

Katharina Lust, Elly M Tanaka

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Novel Method for Culturing Telencephalic Neurons in Axolotls.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Age-dependent regenerative mechanisms in the brain.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Focal Impact Model of Traumatic Brain Injury inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina LustResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2580-5492
Elly M TanakaResearch Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4240-2158
Research Institute of Molecular Pathology · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regeneration of lost cells in the central nervous system, especially the brain, is present to varying degrees in different species. In mammals, neuronal cell death often leads to glial cell hypertrophy, restricted proliferation, and formation of a gliotic scar, which prevents neuronal regeneration. Conversely, amphibians such as frogs and salamanders and teleost fish possess the astonishing capacity to regenerate lost cells in several regions of their brains. While frogs lose their regenerative abilities after metamorphosis, teleost fish and salamanders are known to possess regenerative competence even throughout adulthood. In the last decades, substantial progress has been made in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of brain regeneration in amphibians and fish. But how similar are the means of brain regeneration in these different species? In this review, we provide an overview of common and distinct aspects of brain regeneration in frog, salamander, and teleost fish species: from the origin of regenerated cells to the functional recovery of behaviors.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesFishesMetamorphosis, BiologicalNerve RegenerationSpecies Specificityamphibianbrainregenerationteleost fish

Identifiers

PMID30600647
PMCPMC6618004
OpenAlexW2908358008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.