Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600629›Full record

ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2019

Transdiagnostic dimensions of psychosis in the Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP).

Ulrich Reininghaus, Jan R Böhnke, UnYoung Chavez-Baldini, Robert Gibbons, Elena Ivleva, Brett A Clementz, Godfrey D Pearlson, Matcheri S Keshavan, John A Sweeney, Carol A Tamminga

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05130853 (Social Cognition Individualized Activities Lab), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05130853 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Social Cognition Individualized Activities Lab (SoCIAL) for the Training of Social Cognition and Narrative Enhancement in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Generalization to Real-life Functioning

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Campania Luigi VanvitelliRan2021 to 2022Enrolled48ConditionsSchizophrenia, Schizo Affective DisorderArmsSocial Skills and Neurocognitive Individualized Training (SoCIAL), Treatmment-as-usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Ulrich ReininghausCentral Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Jan R BöhnkeDundee Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
UnYoung Chavez-BaldiniDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Robert GibbonsDepartment of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elena IvlevaDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Brett A ClementzDepartments of Psychology and Neuroscience, Bio-Imaging Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Matcheri S KeshavanBeth Israel Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
John A SweeneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Carol A TammingaDepartment of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Maastricht University · NLBeth Israel Deaconess Hospital · USSouthwestern University · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Georgia · USYale University · US

Funding

Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077851 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2007 to 2019
$7.8M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077945 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PEARLSON, GODFREY D · 2007 to 2019
$7.6M
Stability of Biotypes: a Longitudinal EvaluationR01MH078113 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2007 to 2019
$6.2M
5/5 BIPOLAR-SCHIZOPHRENIA NETWORK FOR INTERMEDIATE PHENOTYPES (B-SNIP) - Resubmission - 1R01MH103366 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI CLEMENTZ, BRETT A, GIBBONS, ROBERT D · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077852 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI THAKER, GUNVANT K · 2007 to 2010
$3.5M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077862 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWEENEY, JOHN A · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
Neural Network Biomarkers for Relational Memory and Psychosis in SchizophreniaK23MH102656 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI IVLEVA, ELENA IVANOVNA · 2014 to 2017
$679k
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research 451-13-022NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH102656NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103366US National Institute of Mental Health MH-077851US National Institute of Mental Health MH-077852US National Institute of Mental Health MH-077862US National Institute of Mental Health MH-077945US National Institute of Mental Health MH-078113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The validity of the classification of non-affective and affective psychoses as distinct entities has been disputed, but, despite calls for alternative approaches to defining psychosis syndromes, there is a dearth of empirical efforts to identify transdiagnostic phenotypes of psychosis. We aimed to investigate the validity and utility of general and specific symptom dimensions of psychosis cutting across schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar I disorder with psychosis. Multidimensional item-response modeling was conducted on symptom ratings of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, Young Mania Rating Scale, and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale in the multicentre Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) consortium, which included 933 patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia (N=397), schizoaffective disorder (N=224), or bipolar I disorder with psychosis (N=312). A bifactor model with one general symptom dimension, two distinct dimensions of non-affective and affective psychosis, and five specific symptom dimensions of positive, negative, disorganized, manic and depressive symptoms provided the best model fit. There was further evidence on the utility of symptom dimensions for predicting B-SNIP psychosis biotypes with greater accuracy than categorical DSM diagnoses. General, positive, negative and disorganized symptom dimension scores were higher in African American vs. Caucasian patients. Symptom dimensions accurately classified patients into categorical DSM diagnoses. This study provides evidence on the validity and utility of transdiagnostic symptom dimensions of psychosis that transcend traditional diagnostic boundaries of psychotic disorders. Findings further show promising avenues for research at the interface of dimensional psychopathological phenotypes and basic neurobiological dimensions of psychopathology.

Indexed as

biotypesbipolar disorder with psychosisgeneral symptom dimensionsPsychosisschizoaffective disorderschizophreniaspecific symptom dimensionstransdiagnostic phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID30600629
PMCPMC6313235
OpenAlexW2907104950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.