Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600600›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Feasibility and efficiency of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with a single agent or double agents vs radiotherapy alone for elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two centers.

Chunyue Huang, Yujia Zhu, Qiwen Li, Wenwen Zhang, Hui Liu, Weijun Zhang, Yonghong Hu, Yawei Yuan, Mengzhong Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab for elderly esophageal cancer patients: A phase II clinical trial.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chunyue HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4239-4223
Yujia ZhuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Qiwen LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Wenwen ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Hui LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Weijun ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yonghong HuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Yawei YuanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Mengzhong LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of elderly patients with esophageal cancer (OC) is increasing as the population ages. Until now, the treatment strategy in these patients has been unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficiency and tolerance of treatment with radiotherapy alone (RT alone), single-agent-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT-1), or double-agent-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT-2) in elderly patients (≥65 years) with OC. A total of 271 patients with OC aged 65 years or older were included in this study. The median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related toxicities were assessed. The median OS time for all patients was 23.6 ± 2.3 months, with 2-year survival rates of 48.0 ± 3.0%. The median PFS time was 13.6 ± 1.3 months with the 2-year PFS rate was 33.0 ± 4.0%. Among patients who received CCRT-1, better OS, and PFS were found in patients who received docetaxel than in patients received fluorouracil and platinum. In a subgroup analysis, 118 patients who underwent RT alone had a median OS time of 15.6 ± 1.9 months and median PFS time of 10.4 ± 0.9 months. The median OS time of patients who received CCRT-1 was 28.8 ± 10.1 months compared with 27.8 ± 2.5 months for the patients treated with CCRT-2 (P = 0.537). The similar results were observed for median PFS, with 16.5 ± 3.2 months in the CCRT-1 group and 17.0 ± 2.0 months in the CCRT-2 group (P = 0.321). Grade ≥3 leukocytopenia and grade ≥2 weight loss during treatment occurred in 40.6% and 17.9% of patients, respectively, in the CCRT-2 group, which was higher than that observed in the CCRT-1 group. Our results suggested that CCRT could be considered as an acceptable treatment for elderly patients with OC. The CCRT-1 group presented with a lower incidence of treatment toxicities but comparable survival outcomes, compared to the CCRT-2 group. Docetaxel was superior to fluorouracil and platinum in terms of OS.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDocetaxelEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaFemaleFluorouracilHumansMalePlatinum CompoundsPrognosisSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxelFluorouracilPlatinum Compoundsconcurrent chemoradiotherapyelderly patientoverall survivalprogression-free survivaltoxicities

Identifiers

PMID30600600
PMCPMC6346235
OpenAlexW2908460116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.