Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600573›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2019

Discovering heritable modes of MEG spectral power.

Eemeli Leppäaho, Hanna Renvall, Elina Salmela, Juha Kere, Riitta Salmelin, Samuel Kaski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Human Sensorimotor Beta Event Characteristics and Aperiodic Signal Are Highly Heritable.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genetic polymorphisms iniScience · 2022
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eemeli LeppäahoDepartment of Computer Science, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1100-777X
Hanna RenvallDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.
Elina SalmelaDepartment of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1326-4462
Juha KereMolecular Neurology Research Program, University of Helsinki, Folkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Riitta SalmelinDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2499-193X
Samuel KaskiDepartment of Computer Science, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIIT, Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland.
Aalto University · FIHelsinki Institute for Information Technology · FIGuy's Hospital · GBUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 127401Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 255349Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 256459Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 277655Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 283071Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 292334Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 294238Academy of Finland: Finnish Center of Excellence in Computational Inference Research COIN 315553Biocentrum HelsinkiElla and Georg Ehrnrooth FoundationFinnish Cultural FoundationJenny and Antti Wihuri FoundationSigrid Jusélius Foundation, Swedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain structure and many brain functions are known to be genetically controlled, but direct links between neuroimaging measures and their underlying cellular-level determinants remain largely undiscovered. Here, we adopt a novel computational method for examining potential similarities in high-dimensional brain imaging data between siblings. We examine oscillatory brain activity measured with magnetoencephalography (MEG) in 201 healthy siblings and apply Bayesian reduced-rank regression to extract a low-dimensional representation of familial features in the participants' spectral power structure. Our results show that the structure of the overall spectral power at 1-90 Hz is a highly conspicuous feature that not only relates siblings to each other but also has very high consistency within participants' own data, irrespective of the exact experimental state of the participant. The analysis is extended by seeking genetic associations for low-dimensional descriptions of the oscillatory brain activity. The observed variability in the MEG spectral power structure was associated with SDK1 (sidekick cell adhesion molecule 1) and suggestively with several other genes that function, for example, in brain development. The current results highlight the potential of sophisticated computational methods in combining molecular and neuroimaging levels for exploring brain functions, even for high-dimensional data limited to a few hundred participants.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBayes TheoremBrainBrain MappingCell Adhesion MoleculesFamilyFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetoencephalographyMaleModels, NeurologicalCell Adhesion MoleculesSDK1 protein, humanBayesian reduced-rank regressiongenome-wide associationGWASheritabilitymagnetoencephalography

Identifiers

PMID30600573
PMCPMC6590382
OpenAlexW2906890817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.