ArticleMaternal and child health journal2019
Intimate Partner Violence Screening in the Prenatal Period: Variation by State, Insurance, and Patient Characteristics.
Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intimate partner violence and mental disorders among women: an umbrella review.BMC psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence in Pregnancy: An Umbrella Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Who is Being Screened for Intimate Partner Violence in Primary Care Settings? Secondary Data Analysis of a Cluster Randomised Trial.Maternal and child health journal · 2021Trial
- Differences in intimate partner violence screening preconception to postpartum for US-born versus foreign-born birthing people.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Disability, disclosure, and missed opportunities: a qualitative study of perinatal intimate partner violence screening.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Barriers to routine screening for intimate partner violence during pregnancy in Nigeria.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Non-Obstetric Maternal Mortality Trends by Race in the United States.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Intimate partner violence is a significant risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Sexual violence and associated factors among women of reproductive age in Rwanda: a 2020 nationwide cross-sectional survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2023Article
- Integrative review of the literature on screening for gender-based violence during pregnancy: Barriers, facilitators, and tools.Nursing & health sciences · 2022Review
- Factors Influencing Provider Behavior Around Delivery of Preconception Care.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Screening for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings: An implementation-oriented systematic review.Implementation research and practice · 2021Article
- Computerized intervention for reducing intimate partner victimization for perinatal women seeking mental health treatment: A multisite randomized clinical trial protocol.Contemporary clinical trials · 2020Article
- Disability-Related Disparities in Screening for Intimate Partner Violence During the Perinatal Period: A Population-Based Study.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's HealthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective To measure the proportion of women screened for IPV during prenatal care; to assess the predictors of prenatal IPV screening. Methods We use the CDC's 2012 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, representative of births in 24 states and New York City (N = 28,581). We calculated descriptive and logistic regressions, weighted to deal with state-clustered observations. Results 49.2% of women in our sample reported being screened for IPV while pregnant. There were higher screening rates among women of color, and those who had not completed high school, never been married, received WIC benefits, initiated prenatal care in the first trimester, and were publicly insured. State screening rates varied (29.9-62.9%). Among states, mandated perinatal depression screening or training was positively associated with IPV screening. 3.6% of women in our sample reported prenatal IPV but were not screened during pregnancy. Conclusions for Practice Current efforts have not led to universal screening. We need to better understand when and why providers do not screen pregnant patients for IPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.