ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2019
A head-to-head comparison of five-level (EQ-5D-5L-Y) and three-level EQ-5D-Y questionnaires in paediatric patients.
Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Measurement Properties of the EQ-5D Instruments in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of scoliosis-specific exercises for alleviating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2020Pooled it
- Validation of proxy-reported EQ-5D-Y-3L in younger children with spinal muscular atrophy: age-related differences in performance.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Comparing the measurement properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L, EQ-5D-Y-5L and CHU9D in children and adolescents: a measurement property study.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Article
- Validation of EuroQol instruments in paediatric patients and their caregivers in China: protocol for a prospective observational study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Comparison of the EQ-5D-Y and the CHU-9D instruments in a general child population based on self-reports and proxy-reports.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025Article
- Evaluating the content validity of the EQ-5D-Y for Chinese children and adolescents.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A head-to-head comparison of the adult EQ-5D-5L and youth EQ-5D-Y-5L in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Validity and responsiveness of EQ-5D-Y in children with haematological malignancies and their caregivers.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024Article
- Comparison of the measurement properties and consistency between the EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-Y-3L in adolescents aged 15-17 in China.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Article
- A Comparison of the Psychometric Properties of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L Using Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study Data.PharmacoEconomics · 2024Article
- Measurement properties of the EQ-5D in children and adolescents: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2024Article
- Indonesia youth population norms for EQ-5D-Y-3 L, EQ-5D-Y-5 L and the PedsQL generic core scale: lower health related quality of life relates to high economic status and stress.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Psychometric performance of the Chichewa versions of the EQ-5D-Y-3L and EQ-5D-Y-5L among healthy and sick children and adolescents in Malawi.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- The performance of the EQ-5D-Y-5L compared to the EQ-5D-Y-3L in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP).Dialogues in health · 2022Article
- Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for Indonesia by Mapping the DCE onto TTO Values.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Estimating an EQ-5D-Y-3L Value Set for China.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Article
- Psychometric performance of proxy-reported EQ-5D youth version 5-level (EQ-5D-Y-5L) in comparison with three-level (EQ-5D-Y-3L) in children and adolescents with scoliosis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2022Article
- Valuing EQ-5D-Y: the current state of play.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of a youth version of the EQ-5D five-level questionnaire (5LY) and its three-level version (3LY) in a sample of Chinese paediatric patients.
methodsA consecutive sample of idiopathic scoliosis patients were recruited from a referral outpatient scoliosis center at Hong Kong, China in October 2017 and completed the two versions of EQ-5D-Y. Redistribution properties in each dimension of EQ-5D-Y were analyzed between 5LY and 3LY by logistics regressions. Absolute reduction and relative reduction in ceiling effects from the 3LY to the 5LY were calculated. Test-retest reliability was assessed by examining the Gwet's agreement coefficient (Gwet's AC) for five individual dimension responses over the 2-week period.
resultsA total of 129 idiopathic scoliosis patients completed the two versions of EQ-5D-Y at baseline assessment, among which 70 patients completed the test-retest interview in 2-3 weeks after baseline assessment. For redistribution properties, the proportion of inconsistency was low in all the dimensions, ranging from 0.0% ("Usual activities") to 3.9% ("Pain/discomfort"). Ceiling effects were reduced in four dimensions. "Usual activities" dimension showed significant reduction (absolute and relative reductions: 3.9% and 4.3%; p = 0.025) and the "worried/sad/unhappy" dimension showed the largest significant reduction in ceiling effects (absolute and relative reductions: 7.8% and 9.8%; p = 0.012). The 3LY and 5LY showed very good agreement (> 80%) of individual dimension responses between two assessments, except for the "worried/sad/unhappy" dimension in 3LY.
conclusionThrough this head-to-head comparison, the 5LY had significant improvements in ceiling effects in two dimensions when compared to 3LY but other measurement properties of 3LY and 5LY performed similar in the idiopathic scoliosis patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30600469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.