Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600458›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2019

Nested and TaqMan

R Ramjegathesh, G Karthikeyan, D Balachandar, K Ramaraju, L Rajendran, T Raguchander, R Samiyappan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R RamjegatheshDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-7245
G KarthikeyanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.
D BalachandarDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.
K RamarajuDepartment of Agricultural Microbiology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.
L RajendranDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India. rajendran.l@tnau.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8840-7419
T RaguchanderDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.
R SamiyappanDepartment of Plant Pathology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641 003, India.
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The root (wilt) disease caused by phytoplasma (Ca. Phytoplasma) is one of the major and destructive occurs in coconut gardens of Southern India. As this organism could not be cultured in vitro, the early detection in the palm is very much challenging. Hence, proper early diagnosis and inoculum assessment relay mostly on the molecular techniques namely nested and quantitative PCR (qPCR). So, the present study qPCR assay conjugated with TaqMan

Indexed as

ArecaceaeCocosDNA, BacterialDNA PrimersIndiaPhylogenyPhytoplasmaPlant DiseasesPlant LeavesPlant RootsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneCoconutPhytoplasmaQuantitative PCRRoot (wilt) diseaseTaqMan® probe

Identifiers

PMID30600458
OpenAlexW2908176293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.