Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600456›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2019

Predictors of PrEP Uptake Among Patients with Equivalent Access.

Sarit A Golub, Rachel A Fikslin, Matthew H Goldberg, Stephanie M Peña, Asa Radix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Interventions among Black Sexual Minority Men: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sarit A GolubDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College of the City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA. sgolub@hunter.cuny.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1644-1076
Rachel A FikslinBasic and Applied Social Psychology (BASP) PhD Program, Department of Psychology, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Matthew H GoldbergBasic and Applied Social Psychology (BASP) PhD Program, Department of Psychology, Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Stephanie M PeñaCallen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, NY, USA.
Asa RadixCallen-Lorde Community Health Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Intervention to Enhance PrEP Uptake and Adherence in a Community-Based SettingR01AA022067 · NIAAA · HUNTER COLLEGE · PI GOLUB, SARIT A · 2012 to 2016
$3.3M
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism R01AA022067NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing PrEP adoption for eligible individuals is critical, but limited research has examined individual-level factors that might be amenable to educational or behavioral intervention. Using data from a PrEP demonstration project conducted at a community health center, we examined differences in behavioral and psychosocial factors between patients offered PrEP who chose to accept it and those who declined. In a multivariable model, the odds of accepting PrEP were higher among those with an HIV-positive main partner, greater risk behavior in the past 3 months, and higher HIV risk perception. PrEP adoption was positively associated with PrEP adherence self-efficacy and negatively associated with perceived sensitivity to medicines. These psychological variables were associated with measures of PrEP- and HIV-related stigma. In the multivariable model, there were no differences in PrEP adoption by demographic factors or socioeconomic status. Data suggest that patients' decisions about PrEP uptake may be impacted not only by objective and subjective HIV risk, but also by psychological variables such as stigma beliefs, medication beliefs, and self-efficacy.

Indexed as

Health EquityHomosexuality, MaleTransgender PersonsAdolescentAdultBlack or African AmericanFemaleGender IdentityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPre-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesRisk-TakingSelf ReportHIV preventionImplementationPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Self-efficacyStigma

Identifiers

PMID30600456
PMCPMC6571035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.