Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30600447›Full record

ReviewMolecular biotechnology2019

Ethylene Response Factor (ERF) Family Proteins in Abiotic Stresses and CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing of ERFs for Multiple Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants: A Review.

Johni Debbarma, Yogita N Sarki, Banashree Saikia, Hari Prasanna Deka Boruah, Dhanawantari L Singha, Channakeshavaiah Chikkaputtaiah

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
37.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 204 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Effects of DpTF Gene Overexpression on Dunaliella parva.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johni DebbarmaBiotechnology Group, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-NEIST, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Yogita N SarkiBiotechnology Group, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-NEIST, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Banashree SaikiaBiotechnology Group, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-NEIST, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Hari Prasanna Deka BoruahBiotechnology Group, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-NEIST, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India.
Dhanawantari L SinghaDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology, Assam Agriculture University, Jorhat, 785013, Assam, India. dhanawantarisingha@gmail.com.
Channakeshavaiah ChikkaputtaiahBiotechnology Group, Biological Sciences and Technology Division, CSIR-NEIST, Jorhat, Assam, 785006, India. channakeshav@neist.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7329-8643
North East Institute of Science and Technology · INAssam Agricultural University · IN

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board ECR/2016/001288Science and Engineering Research Board SB/S2/RJN-078/2014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abiotic stresses such as extreme heat, cold, drought, and salt have brought alteration in plant growth and development, threatening crop yield and quality leading to global food insecurity. Many factors plays crucial role in regulating various plant growth and developmental processes during abiotic stresses. Ethylene response factors (ERFs) are AP2/ERF superfamily proteins belonging to the largest family of transcription factors known to participate during multiple abiotic stress tolerance such as salt, drought, heat, and cold with well-conserved DNA-binding domain. Several extensive studies were conducted on many ERF family proteins in plant species through over-expression and transgenics. However, studies on ERF family proteins with negative regulatory functions are very few. In this review article, we have summarized the mechanism and role of recently studied AP2/ERF-type transcription factors in different abiotic stress responses. We have comprehensively discussed the application of advanced ground-breaking genome engineering tool, CRISPR/Cas9, to edit specific ERFs. We have also highlighted our on-going and published R&D efforts on multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing of negative regulatory genes for multiple abiotic stress responses in plant and crop models. The overall aim of this review is to highlight the importance of CRISPR/Cas9 and ERFs in developing sustainable multiple abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants.

Indexed as

Gene EditingStress, PhysiologicalCRISPR-Cas SystemsCrops, AgriculturalGene Expression Regulation, PlantMultigene FamilyPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsPlant ProteinsTranscription FactorsCRISPR/Cas9 technologyEthylene response factorMultiple abiotic stressesMultiplex-multigeneNegative regulatory genes

Identifiers

PMID30600447
OpenAlexW2907524944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.