ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018
Characterization of cavitation-radiated acoustic power using diffraction correction.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Cavitation From DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026Article
- Acoustic emissions dose and spatial control of blood-brain barrier opening with focused ultrasound.Device · 2025Article
- Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025Review
- Therapeutic ultrasound transducer technology and monitoring techniques: a review with clinical examples.International journal of hyperthermia : the official journal of European Society for Hyperthermic Oncology, North American Hyperthermia Group · 2024Review
- Initiating and imaging cavitation from infused echo contrast agents through the EkoSonic catheter.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Acoustic characterization of cavitation intensity: A review.Ultrasonics sonochemistry · 2022Review
- Clot Degradation Under the Action of Histotripsy Bubble Activity and a Lytic Drug.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Effect of Overpressure on Acoustic Emissions and Treated Tissue Histology in ex Vivo Bulk Ultrasound Ablation.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
- Cavitation Emissions Nucleated by Definity Infused through an EkoSonic Catheter in a Flow Phantom.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A method is developed for compensating absolute pressure measurements made by a calibrated passive cavitation detector (PCD) to estimate the average acoustic power radiated from a region of interest (ROI) defined to encompass all cavitating bubbles. A diffraction correction factor for conversion of PCD-measured pressures to cavitation-radiated acoustic power per unit area or volume is derived as a simple analytic expression, accounting for position- and frequency-dependent PCD sensitivity. This approach can be applied to measurements made by any PCD without precise knowledge of the number, spatial, or temporal distribution of cavitating bubbles. The diffraction correction factor is validated in simulation for a wide range of ROI dimensions and frequencies. The correction factor is also applied to emission measurements obtained during
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.