Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30599266›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2019

Region-Specific Differences in Morphometric Features and Synaptic Colocalization of Astrocytes During Development.

Anze Testen, Maryam Ali, Hannah G Sexton, Sierra Hodges, Kira Dubester, Kathryn J Reissner, H Scott Swartzwelder, Mary-Louise Risher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Astrocyte TrkB.T1 Deficiency Disrupts Glutamatergic Synaptogenesis and Astrocyte-Synapse Interactions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Consequences of adolescent drug use.Translational psychiatry · 2023
    Review
  5. Astrocyte-specific CaBiochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Improved tools to study astrocytes.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anze TestenCurriculum in Neuroscience, UNC Chapel Hill, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, UNC Chapel Hill, United States.
Maryam AliDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, United States.
Hannah G SextonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, United States; Neurobiology Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, United States; Neurobiology Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Huntington, WV, United States.
Sierra HodgesDuke University, United States.
Kira DubesterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, United States.
Kathryn J ReissnerCurriculum in Neuroscience, UNC Chapel Hill, United States; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, UNC Chapel Hill, United States.
H Scott SwartzwelderDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, United States; Neurobiology Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Mary-Louise RisherDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, United States; Neurobiology Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, United States; Neurobiology Research Laboratory, VA Medical Center, Huntington, WV, United States. Electronic address: risherm@marshall.edu.
Duke Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · US

Funding

Supp: Effects of Adolescent Alcohol Exposure on Hippocampal Function in AdulthoodU01AA019925 · NIAAA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SWARTZWELDER, H SCOTT · 2010 to 2024
$5.0M
Astrocyte-mediated mechanisms of cocaine seekingR01DA041455 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REISSNER, KATHRYN JOANNA · 2016 to 2020
$1.7M
Glial mechanisms of ethanol-induced damage: plasticity and pathologyIK2BX002505 · VA · HUNTINGTON VETERANS AFFAIRS MED CTR · PI RISHER, MARY-LOUISE · 2016 to 2020
–
BLRD VA IK2 BX002505NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA019925NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that astrocytes play pivotal roles in neuronal synapse formation and maturation as well as in the modulation of synaptic transmission. Despite their general importance for brain function, relatively little is known about the maturation of astrocytes during normal postnatal development, especially during adolescence, and how that maturation may influence astroglial-synaptic contact. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and dorsal hippocampus (dHipp) are critical for executive function, memory, and their effective integration. Further, both regions undergo significant functional changes during adolescence and early adulthood that are believed to mediate these functions. However, it is unclear the extent to which astrocytes change during these late developmental periods, nor is it clear whether their association with functional synapses shifts as adolescent and young adult maturation proceeds. Here we utilize an astrocyte-specific viral labeling approach paired with high-resolution single-cell astrocyte imaging and three-dimensional reconstruction to determine whether mPFC and dHipp astrocytes have temporally distinct maturation trajectories. mPFC astrocytes, in particular, continue to mature well into emerging adulthood (postnatal day 70). Moreover, this ongoing maturation is accompanied by a substantial increase in colocalization of astrocytes with the postsynaptic neuronal marker, PSD-95. Taken together, these data provide novel insight into region-specific astrocyte-synapse interactions in late CNS development and into adulthood, thus raising implications for the mechanism of post-adolescent development of the mPFC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAstrocytesCell SizeHippocampusMalePrefrontal CortexRats, Sprague-DawleySingle-Cell AnalysisSynapsesadolescenceastrocytedevelopmentLck-GFPpostsynaptic density protein 95three-dimensional reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID30599266
PMCPMC6361709
OpenAlexW2906683598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.