Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30598830›Full record

ReviewAsthma research and practice2018

Biomarkers in asthma: state of the art.

Angelica Tiotiu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asthma research and practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Why Every Asthma Patient Tells a Different Story.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Angiogenesis Factors as Emerging Circulating Biomarkers in Asthma.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. The epithelial era of asthma research: knowledge gaps and future direction for patient care.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Early Prediction of Asthma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Angelica Tiotiu1Pulmonology Department, University Hospital, 9, Rue du Morvan, 54511 Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy France.ORCID 0000-0002-8038-9559

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asthma is a heterogenous disease characterized by multiple phenotypes driven by different mechanisms. The implementation of precision medicine in the management of asthma requires the identification of phenotype-specific markers measurable in biological fluids. To become useful, these biomarkers need to be quantifiable by reliable systems, reproducible in the clinical setting, easy to obtain and cost-effective. Using biomarkers to predict asthma outcomes and therapeutic response to targeted therapies has a great clinical significance, particularly in severe asthma. In the last years, significant research has been realized in the identification of valid biomarkers for asthma. This review focuses on the existent and emerging biomarkers with clinical higher applicability in the management of asthma.

Indexed as

Asthma phenotypes and endotypesBiomarkersPersonalized medicineTargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID30598830
PMCPMC6302401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.