Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30598105›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Comparative transcriptome and translatome analysis in contrasting rice genotypes reveals differential mRNA translation in salt-tolerant Pokkali under salt stress.

Yong-Fang Li, Yun Zheng, Lakshminarayana R Vemireddy, Sanjib Kumar Panda, Smitha Jose, Alok Ranjan, Piyalee Panda, Ganesan Govindan, Junxia Cui, Kangning Wei and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Proteogenomics Reveals Microproteins in Activated T Cells.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. RNA NNon-coding RNA · 2024
    Article
  9. MeRIP-Seq for Identifying Stress-Responsive Transcriptome-Wide mMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. mRNA NThe Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yong-Fang LiCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, Henan, China. li_yongfang@hotmail.com.
Yun ZhengYunnan Key Lab of Primate Biomedicine Research; Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, Yunnan, 650500, China.
Lakshminarayana R VemireddyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Sanjib Kumar PandaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Smitha JoseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Alok RanjanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Piyalee PandaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Ganesan GovindanDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA.
Junxia CuiCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, Henan, China.
Kangning WeiCollege of Life Sciences, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453007, Henan, China.
Mahmoud W YaishDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.
Gnanambal Charmaine NaidooDepartment of Biology, Langston University, Langston, OK, 73050, USA.
Ramanjulu SunkarDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. ramanjulu.sunkar@okstate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoil salinity is one of the primary causes of yield decline in rice. Pokkali (Pok) is a highly salt-tolerant landrace, whereas IR29 is a salt-sensitive but widely cultivated genotype. Comparative analysis of these genotypes may offer a better understanding of the salinity tolerance mechanisms in rice. Although most stress-responsive genes are regulated at the transcriptional level, in many cases, changes at the transcriptional level are not always accompanied with the changes in protein abundance, which suggests that the transcriptome needs to be studied in conjunction with the proteome to link the phenotype of stress tolerance or sensitivity. Published reports have largely underscored the importance of transcriptional regulation during salt stress in these genotypes, but the regulation at the translational level has been rarely studied. Using RNA-Seq, we simultaneously analyzed the transcriptome and translatome from control and salt-exposed Pok and IR29 seedlings to unravel molecular insights into gene regulatory mechanisms that differ between these genotypes.

resultsClear differences were evident at both transcriptional and translational levels between the two genotypes even under the control condition. In response to salt stress, 57 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were commonly upregulated at both transcriptional and translational levels in both genotypes; the overall number of up/downregulated DEGs in IR29 was comparable at both transcriptional and translational levels, whereas in Pok, the number of upregulated DEGs was considerably higher at the translational level (544 DEGs) than at the transcriptional level (219 DEGs); in contrast, the number of downregulated DEGs (58) was significantly less at the translational level than at the transcriptional level (397 DEGs). These results imply that Pok stabilizes mRNAs and also efficiently loads mRNAs onto polysomes for translation during salt stress.

conclusionUnder salt stress, Pok is more efficient in maintaining cell wall integrity, detoxifying reactive oxygen species (ROS), translocating molecules and maintaining photosynthesis. The present study confirmed the known salt stress-associated genes and also identified a number of putative new salt-responsive genes. Most importantly, the study revealed that the translational regulation under salinity plays an important role in salt-tolerant Pok, but such regulation was less evident in the salt-sensitive IR29.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenotypeProtein BiosynthesisGene OntologyOryzaPlant ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, MessengerSalt TolerancePlant ProteinsReactive Oxygen SpeciesRNA, MessengerGene regulationPolysomal RNA-SeqRiceRNA-SeqSalt stressTranscriptionTranslation

Identifiers

PMID30598105
PMCPMC6311934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.