ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018
Predicting protein-protein interactions using high-quality non-interacting pairs.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein Science Meets Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and a Biochemical Meta-Analysis of an Inter-Field.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Pooled it
- Pro-Angiogenic Bioactive Molecules in Vascular Morphogenesis: Integrating Endothelial Cell Dynamics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Unravelling the human taste receptor interactome: machine learning and molecular modelling insights into protein-protein interactions.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- THGB: predicting ligand-receptor interactions by combining tree boosting and histogram-based gradient boosting.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Analysis and prediction of interactions between transmembrane and non-transmembrane proteins.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Current and future directions in network biology.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- BoT-Net: a lightweight bag of tricks-based neural network for efficient LncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2022Article
- Topsy-Turvy: integrating a global view into sequence-based PPI prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- PlncRNA-HDeep: plant long noncoding RNA prediction using hybrid deep learning based on two encoding styles.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Evolution of Sequence-based Bioinformatics Tools for Protein-protein Interaction Prediction.Current genomics · 2020Review
- Protein-Protein interaction network analyses of human WNT proteins involved in neural development.Bioinformation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying protein-protein interactions (PPIs) is of paramount importance for understanding cellular processes. Machine learning-based approaches have been developed to predict PPIs, but the effectiveness of these approaches is unsatisfactory. One major reason is that they randomly choose non-interacting protein pairs (negative samples) or heuristically select non-interacting pairs with low quality.
resultsTo boost the effectiveness of predicting PPIs, we propose two novel approaches (NIP-SS and NIP-RW) to generate high quality non-interacting pairs based on sequence similarity and random walk, respectively. Specifically, the known PPIs collected from public databases are used to generate the positive samples. NIP-SS then selects the top-m dissimilar protein pairs as negative examples and controls the degree distribution of selected proteins to construct the negative dataset. NIP-RW performs random walk on the PPI network to update the adjacency matrix of the network, and then selects protein pairs not connected in the updated network as negative samples. Next, we use auto covariance (AC) descriptor to encode the feature information of amino acid sequences. After that, we employ deep neural networks (DNNs) to predict PPIs based on extracted features, positive and negative examples. Extensive experiments show that NIP-SS and NIP-RW can generate negative samples with higher quality than existing strategies and thus enable more accurate prediction.
conclusionsThe experimental results prove that negative datasets constructed by NIP-SS and NIP-RW can reduce the bias and have good generalization ability. NIP-SS and NIP-RW can be used as a plugin to boost the effectiveness of PPIs prediction. Codes and datasets are available at http://mlda.swu.edu.cn/codes.php?name=NIP .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.