Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30598081›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Gut microbiome changes in overweight male adults following bowel preparation.

Hui-Mei Chen, Chung-Chu Chen, Chien-Chi Chen, Shen-Chih Wang, Chun-Lin Wang, Chien-Hsun Huang, Jong-Shian Liou, Ta-Wei Liu, Hwei-Ling Peng, Feng-Mao Lin and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Effects and Adverse Reactions of Different Bowel Cleansers on Gut Microbiota After Colonoscopy.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Hui-Mei ChenInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chung-Chu ChenDivision of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chien-Chi ChenFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Shen-Chih WangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chun-Lin WangFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chien-Hsun HuangFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Jong-Shian LiouFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Ta-Wei LiuFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Hwei-Ling PengDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Feng-Mao LinInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chia-Yuan LiuDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine & Department of Medical Research, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, 112, Taiwan.
Shun-Long WengDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, 252, Taiwan.
Chieh-Jen ChengFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Yi-Fang HungFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
Chii-Cherng LiaoFood Industry Research and Development Institute, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan. lcc@firdi.org.tw.
Hsien-Da HuangInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan. huanghsienda@cuhk.edu.cn.
Food Industry Research and Development Institute · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMackay Medical College · TWMackay Memorial Hospital · TWMinghsin University of Science and Technology · TWNational Yang Ming University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman gut microbiome has an essential role in human health and disease. Although the major dominant microbiota within individuals have been reported, the change of gut microbiome caused by external factors, such as antibiotic use and bowel cleansing, remains unclear. We conducted this study to investigate the change of gut microbiome in overweight male adults after bowel preparation, where none of the participants had been diagnosed with any systemic diseases.

methodsA total of 20 overweight, male Taiwanese adults were recruited, and all participants were omnivorous. The participants provided fecal samples and blood samples at three time points: prior to bowel preparation, 7 days after colonoscopy, and 28 days after colonoscopy. The microbiota composition in fecal samples was analyzed using 16S ribosome RNA gene amplicon sequencing.

resultsOur results demonstrated that the relative abundance of the most dominant bacteria hardly changed from prior to bowel preparation to 28 days after colonoscopy. Using the ratio of Prevotella to the sum of Prevotella and Bacteroides in the fecal samples at baseline, the participants were separated into two groups. The fecal samples of the Type 1 group was Bacteroides-dominant, and that of the Type 2 group was Prevotella-dominant with a noticeable presence Bacteroides. Bulleidia appears more in the Type 1 fecal samples, while Akkermensia appears more in the Type 2 fecal samples. Of each type, the gut microbial diversity differed slightly among the three collection times. Additionally, the Type 2 fecal microbiota was temporarily susceptible to bowel cleansing. Predictive functional analysis of microbial community reveals that their activities for the mineral absorption metabolism and arachidonic acid metabolism differed significantly between the two types. Depending on their fecal type, the variance of triglycerides and C-reactive protein also differed between the two types of participants.

conclusionsDepending upon the fecal type, the microbial diversity and the predictive functional modules of microbial community differed significantly after bowel preparation. In addition, blood biochemical markers presented somewhat associated with fecal type. Therefore, our results might provide some insights as to how knowledge of the microbial community could be used to promote health through personalized clinical treatment.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdultBiodiversityFecesHumansMaleMiddle AgedOverweightYoung AdultBacteroidesBowel preparationGut microbiomeHigh-throughput sequencingOverweightPreovotella

Identifiers

PMID30598081
PMCPMC6311932
OpenAlexW2906766097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.