Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30598080›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2018

Vaginal microbiome variances in sample groups categorized by clinical criteria of bacterial vaginosis.

Hui-Mei Chen, Tzu-Hao Chang, Feng-Mao Lin, Chao Liang, Chih-Min Chiu, Tzu-Ling Yang, Ting Yang, Chia-Yen Huang, Yeong-Nan Cheng, Yi-An Chang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prevalence ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Bacterial Vaginosis: Current Diagnostic Avenues and Future Opportunities.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  16. Understanding and interpreting community sequencing measurements of the vaginal microbiome.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hui-Mei ChenInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tzu-Hao ChangGraduate Institute of Biomedical Informatics, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Feng-Mao LinInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chao LiangInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chih-Min ChiuInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Tzu-Ling YangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Ting YangInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chia-Yen HuangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yeong-Nan ChengInstitute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-An ChangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Po-Ya ChangDepartment of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Shun-Long WengDepartment of Medicine, MacKay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan. 4467@mmh.org.tw.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne of the most common and recurrent vaginal infections is bacterial vaginosis (BV). The diagnosis is based on changes to the "normal" vaginal microbiome; however, the normal microbiome appears to differ according to reproductive status and ethnicity, and even among individuals within these groups. The Amsel criteria and Nugent score test are widely used for diagnosing BV; however, these tests are based on different criteria, and so may indicate distinct changes in the vaginal microbial community. Nevertheless, few studies have compared the results of these test against metagenomics analysis.

methodsVaginal flora samples from 77 participants were classified according to the Amsel criteria and Nugent score test. The microbiota composition was analyzed using 16S ribosome RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Bioinformatics analysis and multivariate statistical analysis were used to evaluate the microbial diversity and function.

resultsOnly 3 % of the participants diagnosed BV negative using the Amsel criteria (A-) were BV-positive according to the Nugent score test (N+), while over half of the BV-positive patients using the Amsel criteria (A+) were BV-negative according to the Nugent score test (N-). Thirteen genera showed significant differences in distribution among BV status defined by BV tests (e.g., A - N-, A + N- and A + N+). Variations in the four most abundant taxa, Lactobacillus, Gardnerella, Prevotella, and Escherichia, were responsible for most of this dissimilarity. Furthermore, vaginal microbial diversity differed significantly among the three groups classified by the Nugent score test (N-, N+, and intermediate flora), but not between the Amsel criteria groups. Numerous predictive microbial functions, such as bacterial chemotaxis and bacterial invasion of epithelial cells, differed significantly among multiple BV test, but not between the A- and A+ groups.

conclusionsMetagenomics analysis can greatly expand our current understanding of vaginal microbial diversity in health and disease. Metagenomics profiling may also provide more reliable diagnostic criteria for BV testing.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationAdultDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansMicrobiotaVaginaVaginosis, BacterialDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID30598080
PMCPMC6311936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.