Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30598073›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

PDRLGB: precise DNA-binding residue prediction using a light gradient boosting machine.

Lei Deng, Juan Pan, Xiaojie Xu, Wenyi Yang, Chuyao Liu, Hui Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. VirVACPRED: A Web Server for Prediction of Protective Viral Antigens.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  14. Machine Learning in Epigenomics: Insights into Cancer Biology and Medicine.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. DeepDISE: DNA Binding Site Prediction Using a Deep Learning Method.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lei DengSchool of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410075, China.
Juan PanSchool of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410075, China.
Xiaojie XuSchool of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410075, China.
Wenyi YangSchool of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410075, China.
Chuyao LiuSchool of Software, Central South University, Changsha, 410075, China.
Hui LiuLab of Information Management, Changzhou University, Changzhou, 213164, China. hliu@cczu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying specific residues for protein-DNA interactions are of considerable importance to better recognize the binding mechanism of protein-DNA complexes. Despite the fact that many computational DNA-binding residue prediction approaches have been developed, there is still significant room for improvement concerning overall performance and availability.

resultsHere, we present an efficient approach termed PDRLGB that uses a light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) to predict binding residues in protein-DNA complexes. Initially, we extract a wide variety of 913 sequence and structure features with a sliding window of 11. Then, we apply the random forest algorithm to sort the features in descending order of importance and obtain the optimal subset of features using incremental feature selection. Based on the selected feature set, we use a light gradient boosting machine to build the prediction model for DNA-binding residues. Our PDRLGB method shows better overall predictive accuracy and relatively less training time than other widely used machine learning (ML) methods such as random forest (RF), Adaboost and support vector machine (SVM). We further compare PDRLGB with various existing approaches on the independent test datasets and show improvement in results over the existing state-of-the-art approaches.

conclusionsPDRLGB is an efficient approach to predict specific residues for protein-DNA interactions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningBinding SitesComputational BiologyDNADNA-Binding ProteinsHumansProtein BindingProtein ConformationSupport Vector MachineDNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-binding residueIncremental feature selectionLight gradient boostingRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID30598073
PMCPMC6311926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.