Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30597993›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Non-Invasive Assessment of Intravascular Pressure Gradients: A Review of Current and Proposed Novel Methods.

Tin-Quoc Nguyen, Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen, Thor Bechsgaard, Lars Lönn, Jørgen Arendt Jensen, Michael Bachmann Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tin-Quoc NguyenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. tinqnguyen@gmail.com.
Kristoffer Lindskov HansenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. lindskov@gmail.com.
Thor BechsgaardDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital Svendborg Hospital, Baagøes Alle 31, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark. thorbechsgaard@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6993-7692
Lars LönnDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. lonn.lars@gmail.com.
Jørgen Arendt JensenCenter for Fast Ultrasound Imaging, DTU Elektro, Technical University of Denmark, Ørsteds Plads Building 349, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark. jaj@elektro.dtu.dk.
Michael Bachmann NielsenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. mbn@dadlnet.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-9380-1688
University of Copenhagen · DKOdense University Hospital · DKØrsted (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive catheterization is associated with a low risk of serious complications. However, although it is the gold standard for measuring pressure gradients, it induces changes to blood flow and requires significant resources. Therefore, non-invasive alternatives are urgently needed. Pressure gradients are routinely estimated non-invasively in clinical settings using ultrasound and calculated with the simplified Bernoulli equation, a method with several limitations. A PubMed literature search on validation of non-invasive techniques was conducted, and studies were included if non-invasively estimated pressure gradients were compared with invasively measured pressure gradients in vivo. Pressure gradients were mainly estimated from velocities obtained with Doppler ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging. Most studies used the simplified Bernoulli equation, but more recent studies have employed the expanded Bernoulli and Navier⁻Stokes equations. Overall, the studies reported good correlation between non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients and catheterization. Despite having strong correlations, several studies reported the non-invasive techniques to either overestimate or underestimate the invasive measurements, thus questioning the accuracy of the non-invasive methods. In conclusion, more advanced imaging techniques may be needed to overcome the shortcomings of current methods.

Indexed as

intravascular catheterizationmagnetic resonance imagingpressure gradientreviewultrasound

Identifiers

PMID30597993
PMCPMC6468662
OpenAlexW2907982735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.