Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30597871›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Fostering Safety Communication among Construction Workers: Role of Safety Climate and Crew-Level Cohesion.

Bhavana Pandit, Alex Albert, Yashwardhan Patil, Ahmed Jalil Al-Bayati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Research Paradigm of Network Approaches in Construction Safety and Occupational Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Determinants for Safety Climate Evaluation of Construction Industry Sites in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Safety Climate Perceptions in the Construction Industry of Saudi Arabia: The Current Situation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bhavana PanditDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2501 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. bkpandit@ncsu.edu.
Alex AlbertDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2501 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. alex_albert@ncsu.edu.
Yashwardhan PatilDepartment of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, 2501 Stinson Dr., Raleigh, NC 27607, USA. yspatil@ncsu.edu.
Ahmed Jalil Al-BayatiDepartment of Construction Management, Western Carolina University, 389 Centennial Drive, Cullowhee, NC 28723, USA. ajalbayati@email.wcu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safety communication among construction workers is fundamental to effective safety management. However, evidence suggests that poor safety communication is a common problem in construction workplaces. In fact, previous research has unveiled a number of systemic barriers to effective safety communication in the construction industry. When workers do not sufficiently communicate relevant safety hazards and appropriate injury prevention measures, unexpected injuries can follow. Therefore, research examining factors that promote or impede effective safety communication is necessary. Towards achieving this goal, the purpose of the current research was to evaluate the effect of safety climate and crew cohesion on the demonstrated safety communication levels. The goal was achieved by gathering empirical data from 57 construction workplaces in the United States. More specifically, the participating construction workplaces were visited, and data pertaining to the safety climate and crew-level cohesion were first collected using questionnaire surveys. Next, a safety communication survey instrument was administered, and the data necessary to compute network density-a social network metric that is indicative of safety communication levels was gathered. The analysis of the data suggested that a positive relationship exists between safety climate and safety communication levels. Likewise, construction crews that demonstrated higher levels of cohesion exhibited superior safety communication levels. Finally, evidence also suggested that a synergetic effect exists between safety climate and crew cohesion in improving safety communication levels.

Indexed as

CommunicationConstruction IndustryOrganizational CultureWork EngagementHumansOccupational HealthSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesWorkplacecohesionconstruction safetyhealth and safetyoccupational safetysafety climatesafety communication

Identifiers

PMID30597871
PMCPMC6339066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.