ArticleJournal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine2019
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Breast Masses: Adjunct Tool to Decrease the Number of False-Positive Biopsy Results.
Article in Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- An observational study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing malignant breast masses.Polish journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Quantitative microvessel orientation biomarkers derived from contrast free ultrasound imaging for cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Can Multiparametric Ultrasound Analysis Predict Malignancy in Testes? An 11-Year Single Center Experience with Testicular Masses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients with clinically negative axilla using contrast enhanced ultrasonography.World journal of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Advantages of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the localization and diagnostics of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2023Article
- Modern Imaging Techniques in the Study and Disease Diagnosis of the Mammary Glands of Animals.Veterinary sciences · 2023Review
- Optimal treatment occasion for ultrasound stimulated microbubbles in promoting gemcitabine delivery to VX2 tumors.Drug delivery · 2022Article
- Non-mass Breast Lesions: Could Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging Be Helpful for Their Diagnosis?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterizing breast masses using an integrative framework of machine learning and CEUS-based radiomics.Journal of ultrasound · 2022Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of granular cell tumor in breast: A case report with review of the literature.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Ultrasound super-resolution imaging for differential diagnosis of breast masses.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Multi-parameter ultrasonography-based predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging of organs.Der Radiologe · 2021Review
- Quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-cystic breast lesions using external perfusion software.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast fibromatosis: a case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2021Article
- The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of malignant non-mass breast lesions and exploration of diagnostic criteria.The British journal of radiology · 2021Article
- Correlation analysis between rim enhancement features of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Prospective evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of breast BI-RADS 3-5 lesions.BMC medical imaging · 2020Article
- BI-RADS 3 on Screening Breast Ultrasound: What Is It and What Is the Appropriate Management?Journal of breast imagingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis pilot study evaluated use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to reduce the number of benign breast masses recommended for biopsy.
methodsThis prospective study included 131 consenting women, from October 2016 to June 2017, with American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 4a, 4b, and 4c masses detected by mammography, conventional ultrasound (US), or both. Contrast-enhanced US examinations (using intravenous injection of perflutren lipid microspheres or sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres) were performed before biopsy. Qualitative and quantitative CEUS parameters were compared with reference standard histopathologic results from biopsy of 131 masses.
resultsThere were 109 benign, 6 high-risk, and 16 malignant masses, with a median size of 12 mm (range, 4 to 48 mm) on conventional US imaging. Of 131 masses, 93 (71%) enhanced on CEUS imaging, including 73 of 109 (67%) benign, 6 of 6 (100%) high-risk, and 14 of 16 (87.5%) malignant. Thirty-eight lesions did not enhance, including 36 of 109 (33%) benign and 2 of 16 (12.5%) malignant. Prediction models using recursive petitioning revealed that CEUS may reduce 31% (95% confidence interval, 23%, 40%) of benign biopsies for masses that are: nonenhancing with circumscribed margins or enhancing with an oval shape and homogeneous enhancement. Quantitative parameters indicated that benign masses had the longest time to peak (P = .078), highest time-to-peak ratio of mass to background (P = .036), lowest peak intensity (P = .021), and smallest difference in peak intensity between the mass and background (P = .079) compared to high-risk and malignant lesions.
conclusionsContrast-enhanced US may be a valuable modality that can be used to predict benign pathologic results of breast masses, thereby reducing the number of biopsies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.