Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30597579›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of eating disorders2019

Implicit attitudes toward dieting and thinness distinguish fat-phobic and non-fat-phobic anorexia nervosa from avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder in adolescents.

Alyssa Izquierdo, Franziska Plessow, Kendra R Becker, Christopher J Mancuso, Meghan Slattery, Helen B Murray, Andrea S Hartmann, Madhusmita Misra, Elizabeth A Lawson, Kamryn T Eddy and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of eating disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Review and Recent Advances.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Estimated prevalence of eating disorders in Singapore.The International journal of eating disorders · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alyssa IzquierdoNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-1176-7456
Franziska PlessowNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-9721-7817
Kendra R BeckerEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-8946-9977
Christopher J MancusoNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meghan SlatteryNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Helen B MurrayDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-3256
Andrea S HartmannDepartment of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.
Madhusmita MisraNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Elizabeth A LawsonNeuroendocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kamryn T EddyEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer J ThomasEating Disorders Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2601-581X

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
ROLE OF DIETARY CONSTITUENTS ON GENE EXPRESSION IN INTESTINAL EPITHELIUMP30DK040561 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MARTIN TORRIANI · 1994 to 2026
$31.6M
Homeostatic and Hedonic Food Motivation Underlying Eating Disorder TrajectoriesR01MH103402 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI EDDY, KAMRYN T, LAWSON, ELIZABETH AUSTEN · 2014 to 2018
$3.7M
Neurobiological and Behavioral Risk Mechanisms of Youth Avoidant/Restrictive Eating TrajectoriesR01MH108595 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LAWSON, ELIZABETH AUSTEN, MICALI, NADIA · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Bone Metabolism and Body Composition in Young AthletesK24HD071843 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MISRA, MADHUSMITA · 2013 to 2017
$930k
Reward Processing in Anorexia Nervosa and Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder: Behavior, Hormonal Concentrations, and Brain Activation in Low-Weight Eating Disorders.F32MH111127 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BECKER, KENDRA R · 2016 to 2018
$185k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD071843NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK040561NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH108595-03, F32HM11117NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH111127NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH103402NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe majority of individuals with anorexia nervosa (AN) have a fat-phobic (FP-AN) presentation in which they explicitly endorse fear of weight gain, but a minority present as non-fat-phobic (NFP-AN). Diagnostic criteria for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) specifically exclude fear of weight gain. Differential diagnosis between NFP-AN and ARFID can be challenging and explicit endorsements do not necessarily match internal beliefs.

methodNinety-four adolescent females (39 FP-AN, 13 NFP-AN, 10 low-weight ARFID, 32 healthy controls [HC]) completed implicit association tests (IATs) categorizing statements as pro-dieting or non-dieting and true or false (questionnaire-based IAT), and images of female models as underweight or normal-weight and words as positive or negative (picture-based IAT). We used the Eating Disorder Examination to categorize FP- versus NFP-AN presentations.

resultsIndividuals with FP-AN and NFP-AN demonstrated a stronger association between pro-dieting and true statements, whereas those with ARFID and HCs demonstrated a stronger association between pro-dieting and false statements. Furthermore, while all groups demonstrated a negative implicit association with underweight models, HC participants had a significantly stronger negative association than individuals with FP-AN and NFP-AN. DISCUSSION: Individuals with NFP-AN exhibited a mixed pattern in which some of their implicit associations were consistent with their explicit endorsements, whereas others were not, possibly reflecting a minimizing response style on explicit measures. In contrast, individuals with ARFID demonstrated implicit associations consistent with explicit endorsements. Replication studies are needed to confirm whether the questionnaire-based IAT is a promising method of differentiating between restrictive eating disorders that share similar clinical characteristics.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaChildDietFearFeeding and Eating DisordersFemaleHumansObesityRetrospective StudiesThinnessWeight GainYoung Adultanorexia nervosaARFIDavoidant/restrictive food intake disorderdietingdrive for thinnessIATimplicit association test

Identifiers

PMID30597579
PMCPMC6485241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.