Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30597533›Full record

ReviewBiotechnology and bioengineering2019

Synthetic biology for bioengineering virus-like particle vaccines.

Hayley K Charlton Hume, João Vidigal, Manuel J T Carrondo, Anton P J Middelberg, António Roldão, Linda H L Lua

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hayley K Charlton HumeThe University of Queensland, Australian Institute of Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
João VidigalHealth & Pharma Division, Animal Cell Technology Unit, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (iBET), Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6486-4762
Manuel J T CarrondoHealth & Pharma Division, Animal Cell Technology Unit, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (iBET), Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4550-4574
Anton P J MiddelbergFaculty of Engineering, Computer and Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
António RoldãoHealth & Pharma Division, Animal Cell Technology Unit, Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica (iBET), Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0414-4899
Linda H L LuaThe University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9756-7083
Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica · PTThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Adelaide · AU

Funding

Catalytic Immunity and Autoimmune MechanismsR01CA090564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI TRAMONTANO, ALFONSO · 2002 to 2004
$794k
PREVENTIVE ONCOLOGY ACADEMIC AWARDK07CA001541 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI FIORE, MICHAEL C · 1990 to 1993
–
CLINICAL PEDIATRIC MEDICAL/SURGICAL ONCOLOGY AWARDK12CA001704 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SCHWARTZ, ALAN L · 1992 to 1996
–
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccination is the most effective method of disease prevention and control. Many viruses and bacteria that once caused catastrophic pandemics (e.g., smallpox, poliomyelitis, measles, and diphtheria) are either eradicated or effectively controlled through routine vaccination programs. Nonetheless, vaccine manufacturing remains incredibly challenging. Viruses exhibiting high antigenic diversity and high mutation rates cannot be fairly contested using traditional vaccine production methods and complexities surrounding the manufacturing processes, which impose significant limitations. Virus-like particles (VLPs) are recombinantly produced viral structures that exhibit immunoprotective traits of native viruses but are noninfectious. Several VLPs that compositionally match a given natural virus have been developed and licensed as vaccines. Expansively, a plethora of studies now confirms that VLPs can be designed to safely present heterologous antigens from a variety of pathogens unrelated to the chosen carrier VLPs. Owing to this design versatility, VLPs offer technological opportunities to modernize vaccine supply and disease response through rational bioengineering. These opportunities are greatly enhanced with the application of synthetic biology, the redesign and construction of novel biological entities. This review outlines how synthetic biology is currently applied to engineer VLP functions and manufacturing process. Current and developing technologies for the identification of novel target-specific antigens and their usefulness for rational engineering of VLP functions (e.g., presentation of structurally diverse antigens, enhanced antigen immunogenicity, and improved vaccine stability) are described. When applied to manufacturing processes, synthetic biology approaches can also overcome specific challenges in VLP vaccine production. Finally, we address several challenges and benefits associated with the translation of VLP vaccine development into the industry.

Indexed as

Vaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAnimalsBioengineeringComputational BiologyHumansModels, MolecularSynthetic BiologyVaccines, Virus-Like Particlecapsomerecomputationalomics technologiessynthetic biologyvaccinevirus-like particle

Identifiers

PMID30597533
PMCPMC7161758
OpenAlexW2906695249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.