Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30597041›Full record

ArticleEndocrinology2019

Phosphorylated Progesterone Receptor Isoforms Mediate Opposing Stem Cell and Proliferative Breast Cancer Cell Fates.

Thu H Truong, Amy R Dwyer, Caroline H Diep, Hsiangyu Hu, Kyla M Hagen, Carol A Lange

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A New Diterpenoid of IndonesianMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Ablation of Akt2 and AMPKActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thu H TruongMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Amy R DwyerMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Caroline H DiepMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Hsiangyu HuMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kyla M HagenMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Carol A LangeMasonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Timothy C. Hallstrom · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
TRAINING-PULMONARY CELL &MOLECULAR BIOLOGY &PHYSIOLOGYT32HL007741 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI DUDLEY, R. ADAMS, INGBAR, DAVID H · 1994 to 2023
$13.9M
TRAINING GRANT IN MICROBIOLOGY/CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009138 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Scott M. Dehm · 1985 to 2026
$11.3M
Progesterone Receptor (PR) Signaling Cross Talk Drives ER+ Breast CancerR01CA229697 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Carol A Lange, Douglas Yee · 2020 to 2026
$3.6M
Role of Phospho-Progesterone Receptors (PR) in Hormone Refractory Breast CancerR01CA159712 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI LANGE, CAROL A · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
PELP1 mislocalization favors hormone-induced breast cancer developmentF32CA210340 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI TRUONG, THU HA · 2017 to 2019
$147k
NCI NIH HHS F32 CA210340NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA159712NCI NIH HHS R01 CA229697NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009138NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progesterone receptors (PRs) are key modifiers of estrogen receptor (ER) target genes and drivers of luminal breast cancer progression. Total PR expression, rather than isoform-specific PR expression, is measured in breast tumors as an indicator of functional ER. We identified phenotypic differences between PR-A and PR-B in luminal breast cancer models with a focus on tumorsphere biology. Our findings indicated that PR-A is a dominant driver of cancer stem cell (CSC) expansion in T47D models, and PR-B is a potent driver of anchorage-independent proliferation. PR-A+ tumorspheres were enriched for aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity, CD44+/CD24-, and CD49f+/CD24- cell populations relative to PR-B+ tumorspheres. Progestin promoted heightened expression of known CSC-associated target genes in PR-A+ but not PR-B+ cells cultured as tumorspheres. We report robust phosphorylation of PR-A relative to PR-B Ser294 and found that this residue is required for PR-A-induced expression of CSC-associated genes and CSC behavior. Cells expressing PR-A S294A exhibited impaired CSC phenotypes but heightened anchorage-independent cell proliferation. The PR target gene and coactivator, FOXO1, promoted PR phosphorylation and tumorsphere formation. The FOXO1 inhibitor (AS1842856) alone or combined with onapristone (PR antagonist), blunted phosphorylated PR, and tumorsphere formation in PR-A+ and PR-B+ T47D, MCF7, and BT474 models. Our data revealed unique isoform-specific functions of phosphorylated PRs as modulators of distinct and opposing pathways relevant to mechanisms of late recurrence. A clear understanding of PR isoforms, phosphorylation events, and the role of cofactors could lead to novel biomarkers of advanced tumor behavior and reveal new approaches to pharmacologically target CSCs in luminal breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsForkhead Box Protein O1Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsNeoplastic Stem CellsReceptors, ProgesteroneForkhead Box Protein O1FOXO1 protein, humanReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID30597041
PMCPMC6349004
OpenAlexW2906766787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.