ArticlePloS one2018
Short-term effects of fine particulate matter on non-accidental and circulatory diseases mortality: A time series study among the elder in Changchun.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Key factors in epidemiological exposure and insights for environmental management: Evidence from meta-analysis.Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987) · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of ambient OScientific reports · 2025Article
- Association between low-concentration PMFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Performance of fine particulate matter data on air quality in an epidemiological study in Salvador, Brazil.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- The effects of ambient particulate matter air pollution on platelets and hemostasis.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- A longitudinal study of the influence of air pollutants on children: a robust multivariate approach.Journal of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Automatic weighing system vs. manual weighing precision comparison in PM-loaded filter measurements under different humidity conditions.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2023Article
- Diverse applications and development of aptamer detection technology.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2023Review
- Effect of short-term exposure to ambient air pollutants on non-accidental mortality in emergency department visits: a time-series study.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Short-term joint effects of ambient PMFrontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Effect modification by sex for associations of fine particulate matter (PMEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2022Article
- Relationship between Air Pollution and Hospital Admissions for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Changchun, China: A Season-Stratified Case-Cross Study.Canadian respiratory journal · 2021Article
- The short-term effect of PMEnvironmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
- Health disparities attributable to air pollutant exposure in North Carolina: Influence of residential environmental and social factors.Health & place · 2020Article
- Particulate Matter Mortality Rates and Their Modification by Spatial Synoptic Classification.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesFine particulate matter (PM2.5, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 μm) has multiple adverse effects on human health, especially on the respiratory and circulatory system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term effect of PM2.5 on the mortality risk of non-accidental and circulatory diseases, and to explore the potential effect modification by sex, education and death location.
methodsWe collected daily mortality counts of Changchun (China) residents, daily meteorology and air pollution data, from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2017. We focused on the elderly (≥65 years old) population who died from non-accidental causes and circulatory diseases, and stratified them by sex, education, and death location. A generalized additive Poisson regression model (GAM) was used to analyse the impact of air pollutants on mortality. We fit single pollutant models to examine PM2.5 effects with different lag structures of single-day (distributed lag:lag0-lag3) and multi-day (moving average lag: lag01-lag03). To test the sensitivity of the model, a multi-pollutant model was established when the PM2.5 effect was strongest.
resultsIn the single pollutant models, an increment of PM2.5 by 10 μg/m3 at lag0-3 was associated with a 0.385% (95% CI: 0.069% to 0.702%) increase in daily non-accidental mortality and a 0.442% (95% CI: 0.038% to 0.848%) increase in daily circulatory disease mortality. NO2 (lag1) and O3 (lag0, lag1, lag2, lag01,lag02, lag03) were associated with daily non-accidental death and NO2 (lag1, lag3, lag03) and O3 (lag0, lag1, lag01,lag02, lag03) were associated with daily circulatory disease mortality. In the co-pollutant models, the risk estimates for PM2.5 changed slightly. The excess mortality risk of non-accidental and circulatory diseases was higher for women, people with low education, and died outside hospital.
conclusionsWe found that short-term exposure to PM2.5 increased the mortality risk of non-accidental and circulatory diseases among the elderly in Changchun. Women, people with low education and died outside hospital are more susceptible to PM2.5. NO2 and O3 were also associated with an increase in mortality from non-accidental and circulatory diseases and the O3 is a high effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.