ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional scene boundary representations for wall orientation and distance are represented distinctly in the human visual cortex.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Naturalizing perceptual experience: the explanatory power of probabilistic computation and the holographic solution.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- In silico discovery of representational relationships across visual cortex.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Recurrence affects the geometry of visual representations across the ventral visual stream in the human brain.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Where do I go? Decoding temporal neural dynamics of scene processing and visuospatial memory interactions using convolutional neural networks.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Fixation-related potentials during a virtual navigation task: The influence of image statistics on early cortical processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Complexity Matters: Normalization to Prototypical Viewpoint Induces Memory Distortion along the Vertical Axis of Scenes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Independent spatiotemporal effects of spatial attention and background clutter on human object location representations.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- The spatiotemporal neural dynamics of object location representations in the human brain.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
- How much can we differentiate at a brief glance: revealing the truer limit in conscious contents through the massive report paradigm (MRP).Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- The Neural Responses of Visual Complexity in the Oddball Paradigm: An ERP Study.Brain sciences · 2022Article
- Dynamic Electrode-to-Image (DETI) mapping reveals the human brain's spatiotemporal code of visual information.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Singularity and consciousness: A neuropsychological contribution.Journal of neuropsychology · 2021Review
- Depth in convolutional neural networks solves scene segmentation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selective brain responses to objects arise within a few hundreds of milliseconds of neural processing, suggesting that visual object recognition is mediated by rapid feed-forward activations. Yet disruption of neural responses in early visual cortex beyond feed-forward processing stages affects object recognition performance. Here, we unite these discrepant findings by reporting that object recognition involves enhanced feedback activity (recurrent processing within early visual cortex) when target objects are embedded in natural scenes that are characterized by high complexity. Human participants performed an animal target detection task on natural scenes with low, medium or high complexity as determined by a computational model of low-level contrast statistics. Three converging lines of evidence indicate that feedback was selectively enhanced for high complexity scenes. First, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in early visual cortex (V1) was enhanced for target objects in scenes with high, but not low or medium complexity. Second, event-related potentials (ERPs) evoked by target objects were selectively enhanced at feedback stages of visual processing (from ~220 ms onwards) for high complexity scenes only. Third, behavioral performance for high complexity scenes deteriorated when participants were pressed for time and thus less able to incorporate the feedback activity. Modeling of the reaction time distributions using drift diffusion revealed that object information accumulated more slowly for high complexity scenes, with evidence accumulation being coupled to trial-to-trial variation in the EEG feedback response. Together, these results suggest that while feed-forward activity may suffice to recognize isolated objects, the brain employs recurrent processing more adaptively in naturalistic settings, using minimal feedback for simple scenes and increasing feedback for complex scenes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.