Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30596632›Full record

SynthesisMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Pepsin in Saliva as a Diagnostic Marker for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Zihao Guo, Hao Wu, Jiali Jiang, Chuan Zhang

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Saudi Gastroenterology Association consensus on the clinical care pathway for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Salivary biomarkers and esophageal disorders.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022
    Review
  10. How I Approach Laryngopharyngoesophageal Reflux (LPR).Current gastroenterology reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Pepsin and Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Carcinomas.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. [Intraoperative Aspiration].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zihao GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Hao WuDepartment of Cardiovascular, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Jiali JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).
Chuan ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tong Ren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is very common. Salivary pepsin detection has previously been considered as a method for GERD diagnosis. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the utility of salivary pepsin assay as a diagnostic tool of GERD. MATERIAL AND METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochran Library, and EMBASE (from January 1980 to 23 October 2018) were searched for pepsin in saliva for GERD diagnosis. We summarized the retrieved specificity, sensitivity, negative likelihood ratio (NLR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves data in the meta-analysis. RESULTS In final analysis, a total of 5 studies were included. The summary sensitivity, specificity, NLR, and PLR were 0.60 (95% CI 0.41-0.76), 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.86), 0.56 (95% CI 0.34-0.93), and 2.1 (95% CI 1.1-4.1), respectively. The pooled DOR was 4 (95% CI 1.0-11.0) and area under the ROC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.66-0.74). CONCLUSIONS The meta-analysis showed that pepsin in saliva has moderate diagnostic value for GERD, and is not as helpful as previously thought.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersGastroesophageal RefluxHumansOdds RatioPepsin AROC CurveSalivaSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkersPepsin A

Identifiers

PMID30596632
PMCPMC6324865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.