Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30596477›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Symbiont location, host fitness, and possible coadaptation in a symbiosis between social amoebae and bacteria.

Longfei Shu, Debra A Brock, Katherine S Geist, Jacob W Miller, David C Queller, Joan E Strassmann, Susanne DiSalvo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Complex third-party effects in theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Amoebae: beyond pathogens- exploring their benefits and future potential.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Similar cost ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Longfei Shu *Environmental Microbiomics Research Center and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-906X
Debra A Brock *Department of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4349-5854
Katherine S GeistDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, United States.
Jacob W MillerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, United States.
David C QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, United States.
Joan E StrassmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University, St Louis, United States.
Susanne DiSalvoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4001-4672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent symbioses, particularly facultative ones, are well suited for unravelling the evolutionary give and take between partners. Here we look at variation in natural isolates of the social amoeba

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalSymbiosisBurkholderiaDictyosteliumamoebaeBurkholderiadictyosteliumevolutionary biologyinfectious diseasemicrobiologysymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID30596477
PMCPMC6336404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.