Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30596475›Full record

ArticleeLife2018

Pre-saccadic remapping relies on dynamics of spatial attention.

Martin Szinte, Donatas Jonikaitis, Dragan Rangelov, Heiner Deubel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Population-Level Activity Dissociates Preparatory Overt from Covert Attention.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pre-microsaccadic Modulation in Foveal V1: Enhancement in the Current and Future Stimulus Locations.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Decoding Remapped Spatial Information in the Peri-Saccadic Period.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. A computational account of transsaccadic attentional allocation based on visual gain fields.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. WIDESPREAD RECEPTIVE FIELD REMAPPING IN EARLY VISUAL CORTEX.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Visual Remapping.Annual review of vision science · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sounds are remapped across saccades.Scientific reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Martin SzinteDepartment of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2040-4005
Donatas JonikaitisDepartment of Neurobiology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9851-0903
Dragan RangelovQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Heiner DeubelAllgemeine und Experimentelle Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Marie Curie 704537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each saccade shifts the projections of the visual scene on the retina. It has been proposed that the receptive fields of neurons in oculomotor areas are predictively remapped to account for these shifts. While remapping of the whole visual scene seems prohibitively complex, selection by attention may limit these processes to a subset of attended locations. Because attentional selection consumes time, remapping of attended locations should evolve in time, too. In our study, we cued a spatial location by presenting an attention-capturing cue at different times before a saccade and constructed maps of attentional allocation across the visual field. We observed no remapping of attention when the cue appeared shortly before saccade. In contrast, when the cue appeared sufficiently early before saccade, attentional resources were reallocated precisely to the remapped location. Our results show that pre-saccadic remapping takes time to develop suggesting that it relies on the spatial and temporal dynamics of spatial attention.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionCuesFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationSaccadesTime FactorsVisual FieldsYoung Adulthumanneuroscienceremappingsaccadic eye movementsspace constancyvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID30596475
PMCPMC6328271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.