Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30596272›Full record

Trial reportPsychology & health2019

Time for change: using implementation intentions to promote physical activity in a randomised pilot trial.

Stephanie A Robinson, Alycia N Bisson, Matthew L Hughes, Jane Ebert, Margie E Lachman

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology & health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects of a mobile health intervention on health-related outcomes in Japanese office workers: a pilot study.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Daily Caregiving Appraisals, Future Self-Views, and Physical Activity Goals Among Adult-Daughter Dementia Caregivers.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2023
    Article
  15. Exercise and Behavior: Adjuncts to Pro-Myogenic Compounds for Enhancing Mobility in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie A Robinsona 1 Department of Psychology, Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1352-217X
Alycia N Bissona 1 Department of Psychology, Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts, USA.
Matthew L Hughesb 2 Department of Psychology , The University of North Carolina , Greensboro , North Carolina, USA.
Jane Ebertc 3 International Business School, Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts, USA.
Margie E Lachmana 1 Department of Psychology, Brandeis University , Waltham , Massachusetts, USA.
Brandeis University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Greensboro · US

Funding

Core B - Pilot StudiesP30AG048785 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LACHMAN, MARGIE E · 2014 to 2023
$4.5M
TRAINING IN COGNITIVE AGING IN A SOCIAL CONTEXTT32AG000204 · NIA · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI WINGFIELD, ARTHUR · 1990 to 2017
$2.8M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG048785NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA common barrier to exercise is a perceived lack of time. The current pilot study examined the effects of an implementation intention intervention to enhance exercise self-efficacy, increase confidence to exercise when facing time constraints, and increase physical activity in middle-aged adults (n = 63, aged 35-69).

designParticipants received a pedometer (Fitbit) to objectively measure activity and were randomly assigned to either a control or intervention condition. After a 1-week baseline, the intervention condition received instructions to plan how, where, and when they would add steps to their daily routine to meet their step goal, using personalised schedules and maps. Both groups were contacted nightly via email.

main outcome measuresPhysical activity (steps and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity), goal achievement, exercise self-efficacy, time-relevant exercise self-efficacy and affect.

resultsCompared to the control, the intervention condition significantly increased in steps, time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity, and time-relevant exercise self-efficacy. Goal achievement was related to greater time-relevant exercise self-efficacy and more positive affect at the daily level.

conclusionFindings suggest that the personalised planning intervention increased physical activity and confidence in achieving physical activity goals under time constraints. Avenues for future directions, especially for producing more sustained effects, are discussed.

Indexed as

IntentionActigraphyAdultAgedExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProgram EvaluationSelf Efficacyadultsinterventionphysical activityrandomised controlled trialself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID30596272
PMCPMC6440859
OpenAlexW2906727524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.