ArticleSurgical neurology international2018
[Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: Obstetric evolution and short-term perinatal outcomes of a cohort of 21 cases].
Article in Surgical neurology international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00060606 (Myelomeningocele Repair Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Myelomeningocele Repair Randomized Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele: initial results of a tertiary public hospital.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2025Article
- Fetal neurosurgery.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to describe the surgical technique, obstetrical evolution, and perinatal outcomes of a cohort of fetuses undergoing intrauterine surgery to repair open spina bifida (OSB).
methodsWe performed a prospective analysis of 21 consecutive fetuses with OSB at our institution between 2015 and 2017. The surgical technique was similar to that described in the management of myelomeningocele study (MOMS) (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00060606) trial, except that the hysterotomy was performed using a bipolar dissector. Postoperative maternal and infant care both were provided at the same institution. There were no losses to follow-up. Surgical and obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes were analyzed.
resultsFetal surgery was performed at a mean gestation of 25.8 weeks (24.1-27.6). The mean gestational age at birth was 34.2 weeks (29.2-37.1). The mean surgical time was 138 min (101-187), the duration of surgery trending downward over time; while the average admission length was 7.1 days (4-32). Fifty-two percent (11/21) of the patients experienced preterm premature rupture of membranes. No patient required any postcesarean transfusions. There were no instances of placental abruption, uterine rupture, or maternal death. Uterine scar healing was normal in 95% of the patients. All but one of the 21 fetuses (95%) survived; the one fetal death was due to an amniotic band. The need for postnatal skin closure was 5%, with one of 20 repaired prenatally with a synthetic skin patch. No case (19) repaired with fetal tissues required postnatal skin closure. Seventy percent (14/20) of the infants required no further treatment for hydrocephalus over their first year of life; four patients (20%) required a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, while two others underwent an endoscopic third ventriculostomy (10%). Neonatal motor function was better than the prenatal anatomical level in 45% (9/20), equal in 50% (10/20), and worse in 5% (1/20).
conclusionsOur data confirm that fetal surgery for OSB is associated with an increased risk of preterm delivery and premature rupture of membranes, but significantly reduces the need for postnatal treatment of hydrocephalus and improves short-term motor outcomes. Our results are similar to those published for the randomized MOMS trial.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.