Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595852›Full record

ArticleCurrent health sciences journal

Measuring Patient Safety Culture in Romania Using the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC).

C Tereanu, M S Ghelase, G Sampietro, F L Furtunescu, A Dragoescu, A Molnar, D Moraru, C Stanescu, O A Gavrila, A Patrascu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current health sciences journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

C TereanuDepartment of Hygiene and Prevention, Agenzia di Tutela della Salute, Bergamo, Italy.
M S GhelaseDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
G SampietroEpidemiological Service,Agenzia di Tutela della Salute, Bergamo, Italy.
F L FurtunescuDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Bucharest, Romania.
A DragoescuDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Bucharest, Romania.
A MolnarHeart Institute "NiculaeStancioiu", Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
D MoraruPneumophtisiology Hospital Brasov, Romania.
C StanescuPneumophtisiology Hospital Brasov, Romania.
O A GavrilaFilantropia Hospital, Craiova, Romania.
A PatrascuObstetrics and Gynaecologic Unit, Filantropia Hospital Craiova, Romania.
A L GolliDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.
M I DragomirDepartment of Public Health and Healthcare management, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To explore patient safety culture among Romanian staff, using the U.S. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPSC). MATERIAL AND

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in six hospitals, located in four Romanian regions (Craiova, Cluj-Napoca, Bucharest and Brasov), based on staff census in the Units/hospitals which volunteered to participate in the study (N=1,184). The response rate was 84%. The original questionnaire designed by the American Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was translated into Romanian (with back translation), pre-tested before application and psychometrically checked. It consists of 42 questions grouped in 12categories, covering multiple aspects of patient safety culture (dimensions). Percentages of positive responses (PPRs) by question and category were analyzed overall and by staff profession.

resultsMost respondents were nurses (69%). The main work areas were surgery (24%) and medicine (22%). The highest PPRs were for Supervisor/Manager Expectations & Actions Promoting Safety (88%), Teamwork Within Units (86%), Handoffs and Transitions (84%), Organizational Learning-Continuous Improvement (81%), Overall Perceptions of Safety (80%), Feedback & Communication About Error (75%). The lowest PPRs were for: Staffing (39%), Frequency of Events Reported (59%) and Non-punitive Response to Errors (61%). Nurses exhibited significantly higher PPRs than doctors.

conclusionsThis small-scale study of staff's attitude towards patient safety in Romanian hospitals suggests that there is room for future improvement, especially within the doctor category. Further research should assess the relationship between patient safety culture and frequency of adverse events.

Indexed as

hospitalHSOPSCPatient safety cultureRomaniastaff

Identifiers

PMID30595852
PMCPMC6286728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.