Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595802›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2018

Clutch Cutter knife efficacy in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms.

Yasuyo Hayashi, Mitsuru Esaki, Sho Suzuki, Eikichi Ihara, Azusa Yokoyama, Seiichiro Sakisaka, Taizo Hosokawa, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Takahiro Mizutani, Shinichi Tsuruta and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: an update on tools and accessories.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yasuyo HayashiDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Mitsuru EsakiDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Sho SuzukiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Itabashi-ku 173-8610, Japan.
Eikichi IharaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Azusa YokoyamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Seiichiro SakisakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Taizo HosokawaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Yoshimasa TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Takahiro MizutaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Shinichi TsurutaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Aya IwaoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Itabashi-ku 173-8610, Japan.
Shun YamakawaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Itabashi-ku 173-8610, Japan.
Akira IrieDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Itabashi-ku 173-8610, Japan.
Yosuke MinodaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Yoshitaka HataDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Haruei OginoDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Hirotada AkihoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, Kitakyushu 802-0077, Japan.
Yoshihiro OgawaDepartment of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo compare the outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for gastric neoplasms using Clutch Cutter (ESD-C) or other knives (ESD-O).

methodsThis was a single-center retrospective study. Gastric neoplasms treated by ESD between April 2016 and October 2017 at Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center were reviewed. Multivariate analyses and propensity score matching were used to reduce biases. Covariates included factors that might affect outcomes of ESD, including age, sex, underlying disease, anti-thrombotic drugs use, tumor location, tumor position, tumor size, tumor depth, tumor morphology, tumor histology, ulcer (scar), and operator skill. The treatment outcomes were compared among two groups. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes were

resultsA total of 155 patients were included in this study; 44 pairs were created by propensity score matching. Background characteristics were quite similar among two groups after matching. Procedure time was significantly shorter for ESD-C (median; 49 min) than for ESD-O (median; 88.5 min) (

conclusionESD-C achieved shorter procedure time without an increase in complication risk. Therefore, ESD-C could become an effective ESD option for gastric neoplasms.

Indexed as

Clutch CutterEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastric neoplasmKnifePropensity score

Identifiers

PMID30595802
PMCPMC6304306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.