Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595756›Full record

ReviewMemo2018

Short review of biparametric prostate MRI.

Fabian Steinkohl, Renate Pichler, Daniel Junker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Memo, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fabian Steinkohl1Department für Radiologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-2203
Renate Pichler2Universitätsklinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, Innsbruck, 6020 Austria.
Daniel JunkerDiagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Landeskrankenhaus Hall in Tirol, Milser Str. 10, Hall in Tirol, 6060 Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate has become the gold standard for visualization of prostate cancer. Prostate MRI is usually performed as multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Since mpMRI has several drawbacks, a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) of the prostate has been proposed. Many studies have been published on mpMRI and bpMRI in recent years. This short review offers an overview of the latest developments in this rapidly evolving field of research.

Indexed as

Diagnostic imagingMagnetic resonance imagingProstatic neoplasmsScreeningSensitivity and specificity

Identifiers

PMID30595756
PMCPMC6280777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.