Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595551›Full record

ArticleMolecular metabolism2019

Natural helix 9 mutants of PPARγ differently affect its transcriptional activity.

Marjoleine F Broekema, Maarten P G Massink, Cinzia Donato, Joep de Ligt, Joerg Schaarschmidt, Anouska Borgman, Marieke G Schooneman, Diana Melchers, Martin N Gerding, René Houtman and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A structural mechanism of nuclear receptor biased agonism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. What lipodystrophies teach us about the metabolic syndrome.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marjoleine F BroekemaCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maarten P G MassinkCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cinzia DonatoCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joep de LigtCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Joerg SchaarschmidtBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Anouska BorgmanCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marieke G SchoonemanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Diana MelchersPamGene International B. V., 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Martin N GerdingDeventer Hospital, Deventer, the Netherlands.
René HoutmanPamGene International B. V., 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands.
Alexandre M J J BonvinBijvoet Center for Biomolecular Research, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Amit R MajithiaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Houshang MonajemiDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
Gijs W van HaaftenCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maarten R SoetersDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eric KalkhovenCenter for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Molecular Cancer Research, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Electronic address: e.kalkhoven@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLPamGene (Netherlands) · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe nuclear receptor PPARγ is the master regulator of adipocyte differentiation, distribution, and function. In addition, PPARγ induces terminal differentiation of several epithelial cell lineages, including colon epithelia. Loss-of-function mutations in PPARG result in familial partial lipodystrophy subtype 3 (FPDL3), a rare condition characterized by aberrant adipose tissue distribution and severe metabolic complications, including diabetes. Mutations in PPARG have also been reported in sporadic colorectal cancers, but the significance of these mutations is unclear. Studying these natural PPARG mutations provides valuable insights into structure-function relationships in the PPARγ protein. We functionally characterized a novel FPLD3-associated PPARγ L451P mutation in helix 9 of the ligand binding domain (LBD). Interestingly, substitution of the adjacent amino acid K450 was previously reported in a human colon carcinoma cell line.

methodsWe performed a detailed side-by-side functional comparison of these two PPARγ mutants.

resultsPPARγ L451P shows multiple intermolecular defects, including impaired cofactor binding and reduced RXRα heterodimerisation and subsequent DNA binding, but not in DBD-LBD interdomain communication. The K450Q mutant displays none of these functional defects. Other colon cancer-associated PPARγ mutants displayed diverse phenotypes, ranging from complete loss of activity to wildtype activity.

conclusionsAmino acid changes in helix 9 can differently affect LBD integrity and function. In addition, FPLD3-associated PPARγ mutations consistently cause intra- and/or intermolecular defects; colon cancer-associated PPARγ mutations on the other hand may play a role in colon cancer onset and progression, but this is not due to their effects on the most well-studied functional characteristics of PPARγ.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAdultBinding SitesCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansLipodystrophy, Familial PartialPhenotypePPAR gammaProtein MultimerizationPPAR gammaPPARG protein, humanAdipose tissueFPLD3LipodystrophyNuclear receptorPPARG

Identifiers

PMID30595551
PMCPMC6358588
OpenAlexW2904001408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.