Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595456›Full record

ReviewStructure (London, England : 1993)2019

How Structural Biologists and the Protein Data Bank Contributed to Recent FDA New Drug Approvals.

John D Westbrook, Stephen K Burley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PDBe tools for an in-depth analysis of small molecules in the Protein Data Bank.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. IntegratedCurrent medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The P2X1 receptor as a therapeutic target.Purinergic signalling · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John D WestbrookResearch Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. Electronic address: john.westbrook@rcsb.org.
Stephen K BurleyResearch Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, Institute for Quantitative Biomedicine, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA; Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, USA; Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein Data Bank, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: stephen.burley@rcsb.org.

Funding

PDB MANAGEMENT BY THE RESEARCH COLLABORATORY FOR STRUCTURAL BIOINFORMATICSR01GM133198 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BURLEY, STEPHEN K · 2019 to 2023
$19.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM133198
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery and development of 210 new molecular entities (NMEs; new drugs) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration 2010-2016 was facilitated by 3D structural information generated by structural biologists worldwide and distributed on an open-access basis by the PDB. The molecular targets for 94% of these NMEs are known. The PDB archive contains 5,914 structures containing one of the known targets and/or a new drug, providing structural coverage for 88% of the recently approved NMEs across all therapeutic areas. More than half of the 5,914 structures were published and made available by the PDB at no charge, with no restrictions on usage >10 years before drug approval. Citation analyses revealed that these 5,914 PDB structures significantly affected the very large body of publicly funded research reported in publications on the NME targets that motivated biopharmaceutical company investment in discovery and development programs that produced the NMEs.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinAnimalsBibliometricsDrug ApprovalHumansModels, MolecularProtein ConformationProteinsStructure-Activity RelationshipUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationProteinsbiopharmaceutical industrydata depositiondrugsFAIR principlesmacromolecular crystallographynew molecular entitiesopen accessPDBRCSB PDBResearch Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics Protein DatabankWorldwide PDBwwPDB

Identifiers

PMID30595456
PMCPMC7325526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.