Trial reportIndian heart journal2018
Randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of daily and every other day atorvastatin therapy and its correlation with serum hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase enzyme levels in naïve dyslipidemic patients.
Trial report in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The development and randomised feasibility trial of a Nurse-led lifestyle modification follow-up programme among post-myocardial infarction patients.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Atorvastatin combined with routine therapy on HIF-1, VEGF concentration and cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveData regarding efficacy comparison of daily regimen (DR) versus every other day regimen (EODR) atorvastatin therapy is not validated by estimation of serum hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) levels and HMGCR correlation with lipid indices.
methodsIn this randomized controlled trial, we compared the efficacy of DR versus EODR by measuring lipid indices and serum HMGCR levels at baseline and after 12 weeks of 10 mg atorvastatin therapy. Primary endpoint was comparison of mean change in serum HMGCR levels and lipid indices of both groups and their correlation with each other. Secondary endpoints were assessed by estimating serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and creatine kinase MM (CK-MM) levels and adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
resultsA total of 61 patients were enrolled of which 46 completed the study (24 in DR vs 22 in EODR group). The mean reduction in total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) was significantly higher in DR group, whereas mean reduction in triglycerides (TG) and increase in HDL-C was similar in both the groups. Reduction in serum HMGCR levels was comparable in both the groups (31.17% vs 28.19%). Change in serum HMGCR levels correlated more with change in lipid indices of DR group. Also, safety parameters were similar between the two groups.
conclusionBoth the regimens achieved therapeutic goals, however DR was found to be superior as it achieved greater reduction in TC and LDL-C. Further, these findings are substantiated by correlation of lipid indices with serum HMGCR levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.