ArticleIndian heart journal2018
Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts heart failure readmissions and outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Article in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratios in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARTNER Trials and Registries.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Geriatric nutritional risk index and C-reactive protein: prognostic impact in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Heart and vessels · 2026Article
- Associations between blood cell-based inflammatory indices and their changes and mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a retrospective investigation with prospective multicenter cohort validation study.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Article
- The Application of Multimodal Data Fusion Algorithm MULTINet in Postoperative Risk Assessment of TAVR.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Futility in TAVI: A scoping review of definitions, predictive criteria, and medical predictive models.PloS one · 2025Article
- Lymphocyte-to-Red Blood Cell Ratio-The Guide Star of Acute Coronary Syndrome Prognosis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Novel Score to Predict One-Year Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, Naples Prognostic Score.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Association between the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and risk of in-hospital heart failure and arrhythmia in patients with acute myocardial infarction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Association between haematological parameters and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation at mid-term follow-up.Open heart · 2022Article
- Circulating Monocyte Subsets and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: A crucial determinant of reverse remodeling in patients with heart failure undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation?Indian heart journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has prognostic value in acute coronary syndromes. We investigated its utility for predicting heart failure (HF) admissions and major adverse cardiac outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).
methodsData on clinical, laboratory, procedural, HF admissions, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) (all-cause mortality, recurrence of myocardial infarction requiring intervention, stroke) for 298 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between 2012 and 2016 in our tertiary center were collected.
resultsAnalysis included 298 patients. The mean age was 83 ± 8 years, 51% were males, and 95% were Caucasians. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 9 (interquartile range: 6.3-11.8). Receiver-operating curve analysis identified a cutoff value of NLR of 4.0 for MACE after TAVR and sensitivity of 68% and specificity of 68% {area under the curve [AUC] = 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.79], p = 0.03}. An NLR of 4.0 for HF hospitalizations after TAVR and sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 57% [AUC = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.53-0.69), p = 0.01]. NLR ≥4.0 before TAVR significantly predicted MACE after TAVR (68.4% vs. 31.6%, p = 0.02) and HF hospitalizations (58.3% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.03). NLR with TAVR risk score increased the predictive value for MACE after TAVR from AUC = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.50-0.72, p = 0.06) to AUC = 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.80, p = 0.007).
conclusionNLR predicts all-cause mortality, MACE, and HF hospitalization 1 year after TAVR. NLR with TAVR risk score improved predictability for MACE. Further studies for prognostication using NLR are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.