Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30595279›Full record

Observational studyIndian heart journal2018

Balloon embedded bifurcation stenting with single stent for side branch protection - Preliminary results from an Indian population.

Desabandhu Vinayakumar, Kurukkanparampil Sreedharan Mohanan, Kailash Kumar Goyal

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Latest Evidence.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Desabandhu VinayakumarDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Kurukkanparampil Sreedharan MohananDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Kailash Kumar GoyalDepartment of Cardiology, Government Medical College, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Electronic address: goyal31st@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntervention for bifurcation lesions is associated with increased risk of adverse events and includes acute side branch (SB) occlusion during main branch (MB) stenting. This acute occlusion of side branch can often be catastrophic for the patient. We here in describe our experience in Indian population with a technique which can be incorporated into bifurcation stenting to reduce or almost eliminate the incidence of side branch occlusion. METHOD AND

results70 patients with bifurcation lesion were included in the study and underwent a balloon embedded bifurcation stenting with a semi inflated balloon placed across the SB ostium. Angiographic and procedural success were achieved in all the patients. TIMI 3 flow was achieved in both the MB and SB in all cases and there was no incidence of dissection or acute occlusion of SB. Mean fluoroscopy time and contrast volume was similar to that of conventional bifurcation stenting.

conclusionThe present study suggests that balloon embedded bifurcation stenting with a semi inflated balloon to protect the SB is feasible, not associated with procedural adverse events and successful in minimising or almost eliminating the incidence of acute side branch occlusion.

Indexed as

Drug-Eluting StentsCoronary AngiographyCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBalloon embedded stentingBifurcation lesionsPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID30595279
PMCPMC6310700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.