ArticleIndian heart journal2018
Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram as a predictor of perfusion defect in patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.
Article in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of the fragmented QRS complex on electrocardiogram for detecting myocardial scars assessed by 3.0 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.Heart rhythm O2 · 2025Article
- Relationship between NT-proBNP levels and existing/Biomarkers in medicine · 2024Article
- Correlation of left ventricular ejection fraction drop and fragmented QRS with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFragmented QRS (FQRS) on surface electrocardiogram (ECG) is associated with the presence of myocardial scar tissue and may have prognostic value after certain ischemic events. We aimed to examine the anatomical correlation of FQRS with the presence of perfusion abnormalities in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
methodsPatients without a known history of CAD, who were referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) between January 2016 and May 2016, were enrolled. The presence of FQRS on surface ECG was evaluated. The presence of FQRS, number of leads with FQRS, and the location of FQRS as well as patient characteristics were compared in patients with normal versus abnormal MPI. Multivariate model was constructed to identify independent factors associated with perfusion defect.
resultsOne hundred four women and 94 men were enrolled. Fragmentation of anterior, lateral, and inferior leads was detected in 13 (6.5%), 17 (8.5%), and 36 (18.1%) subjects, respectively. MPI was normal in 134 (67.6%) patients. FQRS was significantly more common in patients with abnormal MPI (p < 0.001). Age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.05 [1.02-1.08]; p = 0.001), number of the leads presenting FQRS (OR: 1.46 [1.12-1.92] p = 0.006), and diabetes (OR: 2.33 [1.16-4.69]; p = 0.018) were independent predictors of the presence of perfusion defect on MPI.
conclusionIn the absence of known CAD, FQRS is associated with the presence of perfusion abnormalities. Incorporating FQRS in diagnostic armamentarium may aid us in selecting patients who may benefit from MPI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.