Observational studyIndian heart journal2018
Prognostic significance of fragmented QRS in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing revascularization.
Observational study in Indian heart journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Predictive Value of Fragmented QRS for Cardiovascular Events in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Pooled it
- Risk Factors for QRS-Fragmentation in Patients with STEMI Undergoing PCI.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Fragmented QRS complex as a predictor of no-reflow in myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2025Article
- Significance of fragmented QRS and predictors of outcome in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- In-hospital and 30-day major adverse cardiac events in patients referred for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Dhaka, Bangladesh.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
objectivesThis longitudinal study was carried out to evaluate the prognostic significance of fragmented QRS (fQRS) in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing revascularization.
methodsThis study included 103 STEMI patients belonging to Killip class I and II who underwent primary revascularization. All patients underwent twelve lead ECG at admission before PCI. Serial ECG were done after PCI at 3 hours, 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours and at discharge for detection of fQRS and echocardiography on day 3 post revascularization. Patients developing fQRS within 48 hours and with persistence of fQRS till discharge were included in "persistent fQRS" group. They were followed up after 30 days for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and assessment of LV function by echocardiography.
resultsfQRS was present in 64 patients (61.5%) of study population with 37 patients (57.8%) having persistent fQRS. MACE rates were low (4.8%) and did not differ with respect to fQRS. fQRS significantly correlated with LV dysfunction at 30 days on univariate analysis (p-0.003) but not on multivariate analysis (p -0.10). fQRS was significantly related to impaired myocardial reperfusion as assessed by ΣSTR (percent of total ST segment resolution) (adjusted odds ratio, 95% CI [4.265 (1.034 - 17.58)], p = 0.04).
conclusionIn our study, fQRS did not predict MACE and LV dysfunction in acute STEMI patients belonging to Killip class I and II on short term follow-up of 30 days. But, fQRS independently predicted impaired microvascular myocardial reperfusion as assessed by ΣSTR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.