Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594961›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI research2018

Implications of reconstruction protocol for histo-biological characterisation of breast cancers using FDG-PET radiomics.

Nicolas Aide, Thibault Salomon, Cécile Blanc-Fournier, Jean-Michel Grellard, Christelle Levy, Charline Lasnon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas AideNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Caen, France.
Thibault SalomonNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Caen, France.
Cécile Blanc-FournierPathology Department, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.
Jean-Michel GrellardBiostatistics and Clinical Research Unit, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.
Christelle LevyBreast Cancer Unit, François Baclesse Cancer Centre, Caen, France.
Charline LasnonINSERM 1199 ANTICIPE, Normandy University, Caen, France. c.lasnon@baclesse.unicancer.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-1668
Centre François Baclesse · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to determine if the choice of the PROCEDURES: Forty-seven patients referred for breast cancer staging in the framework of a prospective study were reviewed as part of an ancillary study. In addition to standard PET imaging (PSF

resultsPSF

conclusionsHigh-resolution breast PET acquisitions, applying both small-voxel matrix and PSF modelling, appeared to improve the characterisation of breast tumours.

Indexed as

18F-FDG-PETBreast cancerHeterogeneityRadiomicsReconstruction

Identifiers

PMID30594961
PMCPMC6311169
OpenAlexW2906866639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.