Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30594951›Full record

ArticleSurgery today2019

Factors predictive of high-output ileostomy: a retrospective single-center comparative study.

Mitsunobu Takeda, Hidekazu Takahashi, Naotsugu Haraguchi, Norikatsu Miyoshi, Taishi Hata, Hirofumi Yamamoto, Chu Matsuda, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Yuichiro Doki, Masaki Mori

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery today, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and associated factors regarding high output stoma of ileostomy among colorectal surgical nurses: a multicentre cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. How to manage a high-output stoma.Frontline gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mitsunobu TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hidekazu TakahashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. htakahashi@gesurg.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Naotsugu HaraguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Norikatsu MiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Taishi HataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Hirofumi YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Chu MatsudaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Tsunekazu MizushimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Masaki MoriDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2-E2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHigh-output syndrome (HOS) is a complication of ileostomy, which can affect quality of life significantly; however, its exact cause remains unknown. The aim of this study was to establish the frequency, as well as the preoperative and intraoperative factors predictive of HOS.

methodsThe subjects of this study were 164 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery with ileostomy construction at our institute between January, 2011 and August, 2018. Thirteen patients with postoperative complications reported as causes of HOS, including intraperitoneal abscess, paralytic ileus, and outlet obstruction, were excluded. We used a logistic regression analysis to identify the factors predictive of HOS.

resultsHOS developed in 36 of the 151 patients (23.8%). There were significantly more diabetic patients in the HOS group (P = 0.03), but other patient factors such as age, gender, body mass index, and use of daily laxatives were not significantly different between the groups. The HOS group had significantly more cases of total proctocolectomy (P = 0.04), but other surgical factors such as operative time, and blood transfusion were not significantly different between the two groups.

conclusionsThese results indicate that diabetes and total proctocolectomy are preoperative predictors of HOS, allowing for the possibility of early intervention via post-surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusPostoperative ComplicationsProctocolectomy, RestorativeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleForecastingHumansIleostomyLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesColorectal cancerHigh-output stomaIleostomyPredictive factors

Identifiers

PMID30594951
PMCPMC6526144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.